Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Communication
  • Published:

Non-contact assessment of waist circumference: will tape measurements become progressively obsolete?

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 66, pages 269–272 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

Waist circumference (WC) is a key variable to assess in health management as it is a proxy of abdominal fat mass and a surrogate marker of cardiometabolic disease risk, including the metabolic syndrome. Recently, a portable non-contact device calculating WC (ViScan) has been developed, which hence allows the tracking of WC independently of the inter-investigators error. We compared WC values obtained with this device with WC measured by simple non-stretchable tape in 74 adults of varying body mass indices (range 17–39 kg/m2). The correlation between the two methods was very high (r=0.97, P<0.0001) and the reproducibility (precision) assessed with a rigid phantom was excellent (<1 cm, coefficient of variability<1%). The instrument constitutes a potentially valuable tool for longitudinal surveys and comparative international studies, which require simple but precise measurements of WC in order to track the effect of subtle changes on various health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Browning LM, Mugridge O, Chatfield MD, Dixon AK, Aitken SW, Joubert I et al. (2010). Validity of a new abdominal bioelectrical impedance device to measure abdominal and visceral fat: comparison with MRI. Obesity 18, 2385–2391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geeta A, Jamaiyah H, Safiza MN, Khor GL, Kee CC, Ahmad AZ et al. (2009). Reliability, technical error of measurements and validity of instruments for nutritional status assessment of adults in Malaysia. Singapore Med J 50, 1013–1018.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R (1988). Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Human Kinetics Books: Champaign, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason C, Katzmarzyk PT (2009). Variability in waist circumference measurements according to anatomic measurement site. Obesity 17, 1789–1795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason C, Katzmarzyk PT (2010). Waist circumference thresholds for the prediction of cardiometabolic risk : is measurement site important? Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 862–867.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nádas J, Putz Z, Kolev G, Nagy S, Jermendy G (2008). Intraobserver and interobserver variability of measuring waist circumference. Med Sci Monit 14, CR15–CR18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Panoulas VF, Ahmad N, Fazal AA, Kassamali RH, Nightingale P, Kitas GD et al. (2008). The inter-operator variability in measuring waist circumference and its potential impact on the diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome. Postgrad Med J 84, 344–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas EL, Collins AL, McCarthy J, Fitzpatrick J, Durighel G, Goldstone AP et al. (2010). Estimation of abdominal fat compartments by bioelectrical impedance: the validity of the ViScan measurement system in comparison with MRI. Eur J Clin Nutr; 64, 525–533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2003). Waist circumference: a simple, inexpensive, and reliable tool that should be included as part of physical examinations in the doctor's office. Am J Clin Nutr; 78, 902–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2000). Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. World Health Organization: Geneva. WHO Technical Report Series; no.894.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiology, University of Lausanne, Switzerland

    Y Schutz

  2. Department of Medicine/ Physiology, University of Fribourg, Switzerland

    D Sarafian, J L Miles, J-P Montani & A G Dulloo

Authors
  1. Y Schutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D Sarafian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J L Miles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J-P Montani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A G Dulloo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y Schutz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schutz, Y., Sarafian, D., Miles, J. et al. Non-contact assessment of waist circumference: will tape measurements become progressively obsolete?. Eur J Clin Nutr 66, 269–272 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.183

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.183

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links