Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Clinical Oncology/Epidemiology
  • Published:

Clinical Oncology/Epidemiology

Prediction of survival and recurrence by serum and cytosolic levels of CEA, CA125 and SCC antigens in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer

Abstract

Risk of death and risk of recurrence in 108 potentially curable non-small-cell lung cancer patients were analysed with respect of TNM stage, histological type and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA125 antigen and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC) levels in serum and cytosol. CA125 and CEA levels were closely related to outcome figures. Multivariate analyses indicated that TNM stage and histological type had the best predictive power, but serum and cytosolic CA125 and serum CEA contained additional, independent prognostic information. Predictive information drawn from serum and cytosolic levels proved mutually complementary. We conclude that CA125 and CEA complement TNM classification and histological type for the purpose of quantifying risk of death or recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Díez, M., Torres, A., Maestro, M. et al. Prediction of survival and recurrence by serum and cytosolic levels of CEA, CA125 and SCC antigens in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 73, 1248–1254 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.239

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.239

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links