Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Experimental Oncology
  • Published:

Oral versus intravenous administration of 5-aminolaevulinic acid for photodynamic therapy

Abstract

Endogenously synthesised protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) following the administration of 5-amino-laevulinic acid (ALA) is an effective photosensitiser for photodynamic therapy (PDT). Following intravenous administration, PpIX accumulates predominantly in mucosa of hollow viscera and on light exposure, mucosal ablation results with relative sparing of the submucosa and muscularis layers. Oral administration is effective with ALA in contrast to conventional exogenous photosensitisers such as haematoporphyrin derivative and phthalocyanines. Oral administration of ALA is also simpler, safer, cheaper and more acceptable to patients. We studied the porphyrin sensitisation kinetics profile in the stomach, colon and bladder in normal rats following enterally and parenterally administered ALA using microscopic fluorescence photometric studies of frozen tissue sections. Mucosal cells in all three organs exhibit higher fluorescence levels as compared with underlying smooth muscle following both intravenous and oral administration. Peak concentration were seen 4 h after sensitisation at the highest doses used (200 mg kg-1 i.v., 400 mg kg-1 oral), and slightly earlier with lower doses. The temporal kinetics of both routes of administration were similar although a higher oral dose was required to achieve the same tissue concentration of PpIX. The highest level of fluorescence was achieved in the gastric mucosa and in decreasing levels, colonic and bladder mucosa. A similar degree of mucosal selectivity was achieved in each organ with each route of administration but an oral dose in excess of 40 mg kg-1 was required to achieve measurable PpIX sensitisation. In a pilot clinical study, two patients with inoperable rectal adenocarcinomas were given 30 mg kg-1 and one patient with sigmoid colon carcinoma was given 60 mg kg-1 ALA orally. Serial biopsies of normal and tumour areas were taken over the subsequent 24 h. Fluorescence microscopy of these specimens showed maximum accumulation of PpIX 4 to 6 h after administration of 30 mg kg-1 ALA. There was greater PpIX accumulation in tumour than adjacent normal mucosa in two patients. Preferential PpIX accumulation in tumour was greater in the patient receiving 60 mg kg-1 ALA.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loh, C., MacRobert, A., Bedwell, J. et al. Oral versus intravenous administration of 5-aminolaevulinic acid for photodynamic therapy. Br J Cancer 68, 41–51 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1993.284

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1993.284

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links