Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Clinical Oncology/Epidemiology
  • Published:

Clinical Oncology/Epidemiology

Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin in non-small cell lung cancer: treatment good enough to compare

Abstract

Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin are three of the most active single agents in the chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer. We have combined them for a phase 2 study in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. The regimen ('MIC') comprised: mitomycin 6 mg m-2, ifosfamide 3 g m-2 and cis-platin 50 mg m-2, with routine use of lorazepam, dexamethasone and high dose metoclopramide for anti-emesis. Seventy-four ambulatory patients with untreated, limited (LD) or extensive (ED) disease have entered this study, and 66 are evaluable for response. Thirty patients (45%) have achieved partial remission and 7 (11%) complete remission, as assessed radiologically. The overall response rate is thus 56% (95% confidence interval 44%-68%). There have been 29/43 responses in LD (67%, 95% CI 53%-81%) and 8/23 in ED (35%, 95% CI 15%-55%). The median response duration, measured from the start of treatment is 8.75 months. The median survival for the whole group is 9.2 months. The principal toxicity was nausea and vomiting which was severe or prolonged (greater than 48 h) for one or more courses, in 9% of patients. Performance status (PS) and weight were assessed before, and 3 weeks after the last course of chemotherapy. Fifteen (of 31 evaluable) responders improved their PS and only 1 responder deteriorated. Twenty-one of the 28 evaluable non-responders had no change in PS. The difference in PS change between responders and non-responders is highly significant (P = 0.002). Thirty evaluable responders experienced a mean increase in weight of 2.9% with treatment, whereas 24 evaluable non-responders had a mean weight loss of 3.8%. This change is also highly significant (P = 0.0013). MIC is clearly a well tolerated regime and among the most active combinations in non-small cell lung cancer. It will now be tested in a randomized trial against no chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cullen, M., Joshi, R., Chetiyawardana, A. et al. Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin in non-small cell lung cancer: treatment good enough to compare. Br J Cancer 58, 359–361 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1988.219

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1988.219

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links