Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Experimental combination and single-agent chemotherapy in human lung-tumour xenografts

Abstract

A series of human bronchial-carcinoma xenografts (3 small-cell anaplastic, 2 large-cell anaplastic and 3 adenocarcinomas) established in immune-suppressed mice were treated with combination chemotherapy based on clinical regimes. Xenograft response was assessed by the in situ endpoint of growth delay in s.c. tumours. Dose-response relationships of 3 triple-drug combinations and their component agents were explored, allowing the relative contributions of single agents in each combination to be assessed. The results demonstrate that the effects produced in the xenografts were generally consistent with clinical experience. Procarbazine, cyclophosphamide and CCNU stood out as the most effective drugs in small cell carcinoma, but were ineffective in the other histological types. These was some evidence for individuality of therapeutic response among the grafts, supporting the case for incorporating panels of histologically similar xenografts into primary drug-screening programmes to complement existing syngeneic rodent tumour systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shorthouse, A., Jones, J., Steel, G. et al. Experimental combination and single-agent chemotherapy in human lung-tumour xenografts. Br J Cancer 46, 35–44 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1982.162

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1982.162

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links