Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Variation in response of xenografts of colo-rectal carcinoma to chemotherapy

Abstract

Ten xenograft lines of human colonic and rectal carcinomas have been established in immune-suppressed mice. Mice bearing tumours in the 2nd to 6th passage were treated with maximum tolerated doses of 8 chemotherapeutic agents and tumour growth delay was estimated in terms of the number of volume doubling times gained by the treatment. The average response corresponded to a delay of only about 0.5 doubling times, but some tumour lines showed a good response to some agents. Twenty-three out of about 700 treated tumours failed to regrow. Statistical analysis showed no consistent difference in sensitivity among the tumour lines, but melphalan, 5-fluorouracil and hexamethylmelamine stood out as the most effective agents. A study of two-drug combinations showed that their order of administration had little effect on response. Only 4 of the patients who donated the xenografts were treated with chemotherapy, but among these there was some evidence that response in the xenografts correlated with response in the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nowak, K., Peckham, M. & Steel, G. Variation in response of xenografts of colo-rectal carcinoma to chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 37, 576–584 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1978.87

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1978.87

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links