Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Very Low Prevalence of Endophthalmitis in Very Low Birthweight Infants who Survive Candidemia

Journal of Perinatology volume 25, pages 408–411 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Candida species often cause sepsis in very low birthweight (VLBW) infants, leading to formal ophthalmologic evaluation for endophthalmitis. Our experience suggests that endophthalmitis is rare in this setting, and retinal vascular compromise in extreme prematurity may decrease the risk. We studied the prevalence of endophthalmitis in surviving VLBW infants with candidemia.

STUDY DESIGN:

Epidemiologic data and presence of ROP and endophthalmitis were ascertained for all VLBW infants with candidemia at our institution from 1994 to 2001.

RESULTS:

A total of 123 infants were included. Median EGA was 25 weeks (range, 23 to 32) and median birthweight was 735 g (range, 426 to 1460). Of these 123, only one had transient retinal findings (prevalence 0.8%; 95% confidence interval 0 to 4%), which resolved during therapy. In no case was either the duration of therapy or the outcome of candidemia altered by retinal examination.

CONCLUSIONS:

Aggressive treatment of candidemia has made endogenous endophthalmitis rare in candidemic VLBW infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA . Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2002;110:285–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parke II DW, Jones DB, Gentry LO . Endogenous endophthalmitis among patients with candidemia. Ophthalmology 1982;89:789–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks RG . Prospective study of Candida endophthalmitis in hospitalized patients with candidemia. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:2226–2228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baley JE, Annable WL, Kliegman RM . Candida endophthalmitis in the premature infant. J Pediatr 1981;98:458–461.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baley JE, Ellis FJ . Neonatal candidiasis: ophthalmologic infection. Semin Perinatol 2003;27:401–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Noyola DE, Fernandez M, Moylett EH, Baker CJ . Ophthalmologic, visceral, and cardiac involvement in neonates with candidemia. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:1018–1023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Benjamin DKJ, Poole C, Steinbach WJ, Rowen JL, Walsh TJ . Neonatal candidemia and end-organ damage: a critical appraisal of the literature using meta-analytic techniques. Pediatrics 2003;112:634–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chapman RL, Faix RG . Persistently positive cultures and outcome in invasive neonatal candidiasis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:822–827.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Karlowicz MG, Giannone PJ, Pestian J, Morrow AL, Shults J . Does candidemia predict threshold retinopathy of prematurity in extremely low birth weight (≤1000 g) neonates? Pediatrics 2000;105:1036–1040.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, American Academy of Ophthalmology. Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics 2001;108:809–811.

  11. Young TE . Topical mydriatics: the adverse effects of screening examinations for retinopathy of prematurity. NeoReviews 2003;4:e163–e166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Laws DE, Morton C, Weindling M, Clark D . Systemic effects of screening for retinopathy of prematurity. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:425–428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bates J, Burnsteine RA . Consequences of retinopathy of prematurity examinations. Case report. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:618–619.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Makhoul IR, Kassis T, Tamir A, Sujov P . Review of 49 neonates with acquired fungal sepsis: further characterization. Pediatrics 2001;107:61–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Weems JJ . Candida parapsilosis: epidemiology, pathogenicity, clinical manifestations, and antimicrobial susceptibility. Clin Infect Dis 1992;14:756–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kossoff EH, Buescher ES, Karlowicz MG . Candidemia in a neonatal intensive care unit: trends during fifteen years and clinical features of 111 cases. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998;17:504–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Faix RG . Invasive neonatal candidiasis: comparison of albicans and parapsilosis infection. Pediatric Infect Dis J 1992;11:88–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pappas PG, Rex JH, Sobel JD, et al. Guidelines for treatment of candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:161–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rex JH, Bennett JE, Sugar AM, et al. A randomized trial comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B for treatment of candidemia in patients without neutropenia. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1325–1330.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rex JH, Pappas PG, Karchmer AW . A randomized and blinded multicenter trial of high-dose fluconazole plus placebo versus fluconazole plus amphotericin B as therapy for candidemia and its consequences in non neutropenic subjects. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. Clin Infect Dis 2001;36:1221–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mora-Duarte J, Betts R, Rotstein C, et al. Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis. N Engl J Med 2002;347:2020–2029.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters, Norfolk, VA, 23507, USA

    Randall G Fisher MD & Mitchell Gary Karlowicz MD

  2. Division of Infectious Diseases, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters, Norfolk, VA, 23507, USA

    Randall G Fisher MD

  3. Division of Neonatal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters, Norfolk, VA, 23507, USA

    Mitchell Gary Karlowicz MD

  4. Department of Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters, Norfolk, VA, 23507, USA

    Joel Lall-Trail MD

Authors
  1. Randall G Fisher MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mitchell Gary Karlowicz MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joel Lall-Trail MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fisher, R., Gary Karlowicz, M. & Lall-Trail, J. Very Low Prevalence of Endophthalmitis in Very Low Birthweight Infants who Survive Candidemia. J Perinatol 25, 408–411 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211300

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211300

Search

Advanced search

Quick links