Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Labor Epidurals Improve Outcomes for Babies of Mothers at High Risk for Unscheduled Cesarean Section

Journal of Perinatology volume 21, pages 178–185 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

CONTEXT: Epidural placement for labor in the general population of laboring women is associated with increased incidence of operative deliveries, prolongation of labor, and may be associated with an increased cesarean section rate. The risks and benefits associated with epidural placement for labor in the subpopulation of mothers at high risk for cesarean section have not been studied.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a population of mothers and babies at high risk for cesarean section will have improved outcomes with labor epidural placement.

DESIGN: A decision and cost analysis examining epidural placement for labor on a population of women who are at high risk for unscheduled cesarean section and may benefit from scheduled cesarean section as determined by threshold analysis was performed. Outcomes and probabilities were determined through analysis of the Department of Defense's 1996 National Quality Management Program (NQMP) Birth Product Line data set containing more than 7000 deliveries. Outcomes were defined using variables comprised of all documented conditions that occurred during the peripartum and neonatal hospitalizations. The 1997 NQMP data set was used to validate the results.

SETTING: Military Treatment Facilities throughout the United States and abroad and civilian facilities in the United States providing care to military dependents.

PATIENT POPULATION: Active duty and dependent pregnant women and babies.

RESULTS: About 8% of mothers in this patient population were found to be at high risk for cesarean section. The decision and cost analyses showed that babies of the high risk mothers who received epidurals for labor had better clinical outcomes ( p<0.05) and the procedure was cost neutral ( p=0.23). The procedure did not increase the frequency of cesarean section, and there was no effect on maternal outcomes scores. These results were confirmed by the validation study.

CONCLUSIONS: There is a sizable subpopulation of women at high risk for cesarean section whose babies may have better outcomes with epidural placement with no sacrifice in maternal outcomes or costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen S Strategies for labor pain relief — past, present and future Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl 1997 110 17–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hawthorne L, Wilson R, Lyons G, Dresner M Failed intubation revisited: 17-yr experience in a teaching maternity unit [see comments] Br J Anaesth 1996 76 680–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morgan M Anaesthetic contribution to maternal mortality Br J Anaesth 1987 59 842–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hueston WJ, McClaflin RR, Mansfield CJ, Rudy M Factors associated with the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia Obstet Gynecol 1994 84 579–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thorp JA, Hu DH, Albin RM, et al The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993 169 851–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thorp JA, Breedlove G Epidural analgesia in labor: an evaluation of risks and benefits Birth 1996 23 63–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lieberman E, Lang JM, Cohen A, D'Agostino R Jr, Datta S, Frigoletto FD Jr Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparas Obstet Gynecol 1996 88 993–1000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rojansky N, Tanos V, Reubinoff B, Shapira S, Weinstein D Effect of epidural analgesia on duration and outcome of induced labor Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997 56 237–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson S, Rosenfeld J The effect of epidural aesthesia on the length of Labor J Fam Pract 1995 40 244–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gribble RK, Meier PR Effect of epidural analgesia on the primary cesarean rate [see comments] Obstet Gynecol 1991 78 231–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chestnut DH Does epidural analgesia during labor affect the incidence of cesarean delivery? Reg Anesth 1997 22 495–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chestnut DH, McGrath JM, Vincent RD Jr, et al Does early administration of epidural analgesia affect obstetric outcome in nulliparous women who are in spontaneous labor? [see comments] Anesthesiology 1994 80 1201–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Halpern S, Leighton B, Ohlsson A, Barrett J, Rice A Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor: a meta-analysis JAMA 1998 280 2105–2110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma S, Sidawi J, Ramin S, et al Cesarean delivery: randomized trial of epidural vs patient-controlled analgesia during labor Anesthesiology 1997 87 487–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fogel S, Shyken J, Leighton B, Mormol J, Smeltzer J Epidural labor analgesia and the incidence of cesarean delivery for dystocia Anesth Analg 1998 87 119–23

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson T, Thorp J, Mayer D, Kuller J, Bowes W Does epidural analgesia cause dystocia? J Clin Anesth 1998 10 58–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Clark A, Carr D, Loyd G, Cook V, Spinnato J The influence of epidural analgesia on cesarean delivery rates: a randomized, prospective clinical trial Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998 179 1527–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramin SM, Gambling DR, Lucas MJ, Sharma SK, Sidawi JE, Leveno KJ Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labor [see comments] Obstet Gynecol 1995 86 783–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Newton ER, Schroeder BC, Knape KG, Bennett BL Epidural analgesia and uterine function [see comments] Obstet Gynecol 1995 85 749–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Abboud TK, Afrasiabi A, Sarkis F, et al Continuous infusion epidural analgesia in parturients receiving bupivacaine, chloroprocaine, or lidocaine — maternal, fetal, and neonatal effects Anesth Analg 1984 63 421–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alahuhta S, Rasanen J, Jouppila P, et al The effects of epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine for cesarean section on uteroplacental and fetal circulation Anesthesiology 1995 83 23–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bofill JA, Vincent RD, Ross EL, et al Nulliparous active labor, epidural analgesia, and cesarean delivery for dystocia Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997 177 1465–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thorp JA, Parisi VM, Boylan PC, Johnston DA The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women [see comments] Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989 161 670–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Macaulay JH, Bond K, Steer PJ Epidural analgesia in labor and fetal hyperthermia [see comments] Obstet Gynecol 1992 80 665–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lieberman E, Lang JM, Frigoletto F Jr, Richardson DK, Ringer SA, Cohen A Epidural analgesia, intrapartum fever, and neonatal sepsis evaluation Pediatrics 1997 99 415–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Krakauer H, Lin MJ, Schone EM, et al “Best clinical practice”: assessment of processes of care and of outcomes in the US Military Health Services System J Eval Clin Pract 1998 4 11–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Knox AJ, Sadler L, Pattison NS, Mantell CD, Mullins P An obstetric scoring system: its development and application in obstetric management [see comments] Obstet Gynecol 1993 81 195–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hueston WJ Development of a cesarean delivery risk score [see comments] Obstet Gynecol 1994 84 965–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Harlow BL, Frigoletto FD, Cramer DW, et al Epidemiologic predictors of cesarean section in nulliparous patients at low risk. RADIUS Study Group. Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound Study Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995 172 156–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Richards RJ Using threshold analysis to improve medical decisions [editorial] Hosp Pract (Off Ed) 1997 32 15–6, 19–21, 25–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Everett A Piercing the veil of the future. A review of the Delphi method of research Prof Nurse 1993 9 181–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Detsky AS, Naglie G, Krahn MD, Redelmeier DA, Naimark D Primer on medical decision analysis: Part 2. Building a tree Med Decis Making 1997 17 126–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kassirer JP, Moskowitz AJ, Lau J, Pauker SG Decision analysis: a progress report Ann Intern Med 1987 106 275–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hsiao WC, Braun P, Dunn DL, et al An overview of the development and refinement of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale. The foundation for reform of U.S. physician payment Med Care 1992 30 NS1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Henry M Jackson Foundation, Version.38 1401 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852 1995

    Google Scholar 

  36. ACOG Technical Bulletin Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. Number 225 Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996 54 281–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. National Natality Survey Public Use Datafile US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stata Reference Manual, Version 5.0 College Station, TX.: Stata Corporation 1996

  39. Eakes M Economic considerations for epidural anesthesia in childbirth Nurs Econ 1990 8 329–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Meyer GS, Krakauer H Validity of the department of defense standard inpatient data record for quality management and health Mil Med 1998 163 461–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Jackson JL, Cheng EY, Jones DL, Meyer GS Comparison of discharge diagnoses and inpatient procedures between Military and Civilian health care systems Mil Med 1999 Oct 164 (10) 701–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jackson JL, Strong J, Cheng E, Meyer GS Patients, diagnoses, and procedures in a military internal medicine clinic: comparison with civilian practices Mil Med 1999 164 194–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Jackson JL, O'Malley PG, Kroenke K A Psychometric comparison of military and civilian medical practices Mil Med 1999 164 112–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Johnson JE, Pinholt EM, Jenkins TR, Carpenter JL Content of Internal Medicine Practice in an academic Army Medical Center and an Army Community Hospital Mil Med 1988 153 21–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. G. Meyer's work is funded by a Generalist Physician Faculty Scholar Award from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

The authors acknowledge the anonymous reviewers of an earlier version of this manuscript for their thoughtful critique.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Medicine, Pediatrics, and Preventive Medicine and Biometrics (K. A. C. S., H. K., E. C., G. S. M.), The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD

    Kelly A C Stuart MD, MPH, Henry Krakauer MD, PhD, Eme Cheng MS, MBA & Gregg S Meyer MD, MSc

  2. Forensic Medical Advisory Service (E. S., M. L.), Rockville, MD

    Eric Schone PhD & Monica Lin PhD

Authors
  1. Kelly A C Stuart MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Henry Krakauer MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric Schone PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Monica Lin PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eme Cheng MS, MBA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gregg S Meyer MD, MSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Disclaimer: The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army, Department of the Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the Department of Health and Human Services.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stuart, K., Krakauer, H., Schone, E. et al. Labor Epidurals Improve Outcomes for Babies of Mothers at High Risk for Unscheduled Cesarean Section. J Perinatol 21, 178–185 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200519

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200519

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links