Abstract
The ‘Calman–Hine Report’ (1995) recommended that cancer surgery should be limited to ‘high-volume’ consultants. Through an analysis of 5 years of Hospital Episode Statistics for the West Midlands region (1992–1997), we have investigated whether there is evidence of increasing numbers of patients with breast, colorectal or ovarian cancer being treated by high throughput, i.e. sub-specialist surgeons, who carry out more than a threshold level of primary cancer resections annually. The proportion of cases treated by the high-volume breast, colorectal and ovarian cancer surgeons increased annually during the 5 years. The absolute number of consultant firms who undertook breast cancer resections reduced during the 5 years; but the number doing colorectal and ovarian surgery increased. Throughout the 5 years, half of the ovarian cancer resections were carried out by consultant firms who did very few procedures – less than 5 of these procedures annually. The relatively high case-load, the elective nature of breast cancer surgery and an early policy change have undoubtedly facilitated the move towards sub-specialization. The weaker trends for colorectal and ovarian cancer surgery suggest continued monitoring is required to ensure that there is a reduction in the proportion of people treated by surgeons who undertake few cancer resections annually. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
British Association of Surgical Oncologists (BASO) (1995) Guidelines for the mangement of symptomatic breast disease in the United Kingdom. Eur J Surg Oncol 21: A)
Expert Advisory group on Cancer to the Chief Medical Officiers of England Wales (1995) A policy framework for commissioning cancer services. Department of Health
Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L and Kearney G (1980) Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study. BMJ 281: 411–414
Gillis CR and Hole DJ (1996) Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the West of Scotland. BMJ 312: 145–148
Hermenek P and Hohenberger W (1996) The importance of volume in colorectal cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 22: 213–215
Junor EJ, Hole DJ and Gillis CR (1994) Management of ovarian cancer: referral to a multidisciplinary team matters. Br J Cancer 70: 363-370
Kehoe S, Powell J, Wilson S and Woodman C (1994) The influence of operating surgeon's specialisation on patient survival in ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 70: 1014–1017
McCardle CS and Hole D (1991) Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and ultimate survival. BMJ 302: 1501–1505
Mella J, Biffin A, Radcliffe AG, Stamatakis JD and Steele RJC (1997) Population-based audit of colorectal cancer management in two UK health regions. Br J Surg 84: 1731–1736
NHS Executive (1997) Guidance for purchasers. Improving outcomes in breat cancer. The manual. Department of Health
NHS Executive (1999) Improving outcomes in gynaecological cancers. The manual. Department of Health
Nguyen HN, Averette HE and Hoskins W Penalver M Sevin B and Steren A (1993) National survey of ovarian carcinoma, Part V. Cancer 72: 3663–3670
Parry JM, Collins S, Mathers J, Scott NA and Woodman CBJ (1999) The influence of work volumes on outcome of patients with colorectal carcinoma’. British Journal of Surgery 86: 475–481
Phillips RKS, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L, Fry JS and Fielding LP (1984) Local recurrence following ‘curative’ surgery for large bowel cancer: I. The overall picture. Br J Surg 71: 12–16
Pollock AM and Vickers N (1998) Trends in colorectal cancer care in Southern England, 1989–1993: using HES data to inform Cancer Services reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health 52: 433–438
Porter GA, Saskolne CL, Yakimets WW and Newman SC (1998) Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 227: 157–167
Sagar PM, Hartley MN, MacFie J, Taylor BA and Copeland GP (1996) Comparison of individual surgeon's performance: risk adjusted analysis with POSSUM scoring system. Dis Colon Rectum, 654–658
Sainsbury R, Haward B, Rider L, Johnston C and Round C (1995) Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer. Lancet 345: 1265–1270
Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, Cohen AM, Warren JL and Begg CB (2000) Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA 284: 3028–3035
The Royal College of Surgeons of England and the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (1996) Guidelines for the management of Colorectal cancer.
Wilson R (1997) Utilisation of routinely collected data in health services research: a study of their application across the West Midlands Region of the National Health Service. University of Birmingham
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Jolly, K., Parry, J., Rouse, A. et al. Volumes of cancer surgery for breast, colorectal and ovarian cancer 1992–97: is there evidence of increasing sub-specialization by surgeons?. Br J Cancer 84, 1308–1313 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.1794
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.1794
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Comparison of administrative data with the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) colorectal cancer database
International Journal of Colorectal Disease (2008)
-
The impact of the Calman–Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire's colorectal cancer patients
British Journal of Cancer (2006)