Main

Barriers to the use of a diagnostic oral microbiology laboratory by general dental practitioners K M Roy, A Smith, J Sanderson, J Bagg, D MacKenzie, M S Jackson, G Taylor, and J McEwen Br Dent J 1999; 186: 345–347

Comment

Antibiotics are prescribed widely by dental practitioners. However, whether the appropriate antimicrobial is always used is questionable.

Diagnostic oral microbiology services can play a key role in the management of acute and chronic oral infections by giving the clinician information on the nature and sensitivity of pathogens. Such laboratories also act in a surveillance function, monitoring the changes in sensitivity of microorganisms and providing information for empirical antibiotic regimes. The value of diagnostic oral microbiology services are understood by hospital clinicians that use their services, but are poorly used by general dental practitioners. This paper examines the reasons why general dental practitioners do not use diagnostic oral microbiology services.

The design of the study was a questionnaire which was sent to 797 general dental practitioners in Scotland. The questionnaire was in three parts and sought information principally about the knowledge of oral microbiology services, sampling equipment, cost and transportation of samples to the laboratory.

The questionnaire was well supported and 450 (55%) replies were received. The most frequent reason for the failure to use the laboratory was lack of information, almost half the respondents claiming not to know the facilities were available. Lack of equipment and request forms was also perceived as a problem. Suprisingly, cost and the time taken to get a result was not perceived as an obstacle to taking samples.

It is clear from this study that there is a lack of awareness of the role of oral microbiology diagnostic services in the management of oral infection. Thus it is perhaps the duty of the oral microbiology laboratories to make practitioners aware of these services, and to provide suitable equipment and arrangements for sampling.

More widespread use of these services in the dental community will provide information on any changes in antimicrobial resistance in oral microorganisms. This excellent paper shows some of the barriers to obtaining samples from the community through dental practice to assess patterns of microbial resistance. Information on microbial resistance in oral microorganisms would be enormously beneficial in the design of antibiotic policies. Let us hope that practitioners are encouraged by this paper to send samples to their local oral microbiology laboratory.