Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Prostate cancer and consistency of reporting sexual histories in men over age 50

Abstract

We conducted an in-person interview to examine the reliability of reported sexual histories among men over age 50 y with and without prostate cancer. Marriage and cohabitation were used as memory cues to recall sexual activity. High correlations on test–retest for questions evaluating sexual histories suggest reliable answers for most factors, and specifically for age at first sexual activity, and lifetime number of sexual partners. Low correlations were seen for ill-defined and socially undesirable items. These data suggest that men consistently report most measures of sexual activity when using marriage and cohabitation as memory cues to recall sexual histories.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A et al. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 2004; 54: 8–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dennis LK, Dawson DV . Meta-analysis of measures of sexual activity and prostate cancer. Epidemiology 2002; 13: 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Michael RT . Sex in America: A Definitive Survey. Little, Brown: Boston, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laumann EO . The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holt VL et al. Induced abortion and the risk of subsequent ectopic regnancy. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 1234–1238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Armstrong BK, White E, Saracci R . Principles of Exposure Measurement in Epidemiology. Oxford University Press: Oxford, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fleiss JL . The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. Wiley: New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cicchetti DV, Allison T . A new procedure for assessing reliability of scoring EEG sleep recordings. Am J EEG Tech 1971; 11: 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. SAS. SAS System for Windows. SAS Institute: Cary, NC, 2001.

  10. Rosner B . Fundamentals of Biostatistics. Duxbury: Australia, Pacific Grove, CA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kraemer HC, Thiemann S . How Many Subjects? Statistical Power Analysis in Research. SAGE Publications: California, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zar JH . Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marcus AC . Memory aids in longitudinal health surveys: results from a field experiment. Am J Public Health 1982; 72: 567–573.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stroup N, Dufour M, Hurwitz E, Desenclos J . Cirrhosis and Other Chronic Liver Diseases. Chronic Disease Epidemiology and Control. American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, 1993, vol. xxi: 358 p.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brownson RC, Reif JS, Alavanja MCR, Bal D . Cancer. Chronic Disease Epidemiology and Control. American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, 1993, vol. xxi: 358 p.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Averette HE, Nguyen H . American Cancer Society Textbook of Clinical Oncology. American Cancer Society: Washington, DC, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steele R, Lees RE, Kraus AS, Rao C . Sexual factors in the epidemiology of cancer of the prostate. J Chronic Dis 1971; 24: 29–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chaklin AV, Plotnikov SV . Importance of various factors in the occurrence of prostatic cancer. Urol Nefrol (Mosk) 1984; 4: 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mishina T, Watanabe H, Araki H, Nakao M . Epidemiological study of prostatic cancer by matched-pair analysis. Prostate 1985; 6: 423–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mandel JS, Schuman LM . Sexual factors and prostatic cancer: results from a case–control study. J Gerontol 1987; 42: 259–264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Honda GD et al. Vasectomy, cigarette smoking, and age at first sexual intercourse as risk factors for prostate cancer in middle-aged men. Br J Cancer 1988; 57: 326–331.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Oishi K et al. A case–control study of prostatic cancer in Kyoto, Japan: sexual risk factors. Prostate 1990; 17: 269–279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hayes RB et al. Physical characteristics and factors related to sexual development and behaviour and the risk for prostatic cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 1992; 1: 239–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. La Vecchia C et al. Marital status, indicators of sexual activity and prostatic cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993; 47: 450–453.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Du SF, Shi LY, He SP . A case–control study of prostate cancer. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing XueZaZhi 1996; 17: 343–345.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ilic M, Vlajinac H, Marinkovic J . Case–control study of risk factors for prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 1996; 74: 1682–1686.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hayes RB et al. Sexual behaviour, STDs and risks for prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 2000; 82: 718–725.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study received financial support from the Ireland Cancer Center of Case Western Reserve University and University Hospital of Cleveland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L K Dennis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dennis, L., Ritchie, J. & Resnick, M. Prostate cancer and consistency of reporting sexual histories in men over age 50. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 8, 243–247 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500810

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500810

Keywords

Search

Quick links