Abstract
Transrectal ultrasound-guided core biopsy is a widely used method to diagnose prostate cancer. It is generally considered a safe procedure but the main concern is that significant complications such as infections do occur. To evaluate the effect of a combined two-dosage antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin and metronidazole, a prospective study of 289 patients undergoing core-biopsy of the prostate was performed. Five patients (1.7%) developed urinary tract infection and all did recover without any further complications. The infection rate was significantly lower compared to our historic controls receiving no prophylaxis at all. This prophylactic regime resulted in a low infection rate and it was feasible from the patient perspective. The total cost of antibiotic medication and additional costs due to complications was 18 USD per patient and the cost-effectiveness compared to no prophylactic therapy at all was considered good.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Larsson, P., Norming, U., Törnblom, M. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for prostate biopsy: benefits and costs. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2, 88–90 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500294
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500294
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Comparison of guideline recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis in urologic procedures: variability, lack of consensus, and contradictions
International Urology and Nephrology (2018)
-
Preoperative assessment of the patient and risk factors for infectious complications and tentative classification of surgical field contamination of urological procedures
World Journal of Urology (2012)