Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Intermittent androgen suppression for prostate cancer: rationale and clinical experience

Abstract

Research on hormonal treatments of prostate cancer over the past 20 y have focused on maximizing androgen ablation through combination therapy. Maximal androgen ablation increases treatment-related side-effects and expense and fails to prolong time to androgen-independent (AI) progression. The rationale behind intermittent androgen suppression (IAS) is based on: (1) observations that androgen ablation is palliative, not curative in most patients where quality of life must be considered; (2) assumption that immediate androgen ablation is superior to delayed therapy in improving survival of patients with prostate cancer; and (3) the hypothesis that if tumor cells which survive androgen withdrawal are forced into a normal pathway of differentiation by androgen replacement, then apoptotic potential might be restored and progression to androgen independence may be delayed. Observations from animal model studies suggest that progression to androgen-independence involves adaptive responses to androgen deprivation which are, in turn, modulated by intermittent androgen replacement.

Supported by these animal model observations, several centers have now tested the feasibility of IAS therapy in non-randomized groups of patients with prostate cancer using serum PSA as trigger points. Experimental and clinical data suggest that prostate cancer is amenable to control by IAS. IAS may offer clinicians an opportunity to improve quality of life in patients with prostate cancer by balancing the benefits of immediate androgen ablation (delayed progression and prolonged survival) while reducing treatment-related side effects and expense. Whether time to progression and survival is affected in a beneficial or adverse way is being studied in randomized, prospective protocols. The purpose of this article is to review the rationale behind IAS, compare observations from published series, and discuss potential indications and treatment strategies using IAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gleave, M., Goldenberg, S., Bruchovsky, N. et al. Intermittent androgen suppression for prostate cancer: rationale and clinical experience. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 1, 289–296 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500260

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500260

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links