News | Published:

Austria's science institute gathers steam

Nature volume 448, page 112 (12 July 2007) | Download Citation

Subjects

Plan for graduate-level facility back on track.

Haim Harariinsists on scientific involvement.

Austria will, after all, get the élite graduate-level institute it wants — even though plans seemed on the verge of collapse last year.

On 12 July, an 11-member scientific advisory board was expected to approve the focus for the planned Institute of Science and Technology. All research themes will be interdisciplinary, with focuses in the areas of biology, medicine and the physical sciences. Detailed research programmes will be defined by the institute's scientists, who are now being headhunted. The overall organizational structure follows the example of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel.

That's not surprising, as it is Haim Harari, a theoretical physicist and the former president of Weizmann, who has been driving plans for the institute. Originally spearheaded by Anton Zeilinger, head of physics at the University of Vienna, the project lost steam last year when Zeilinger left, complaining about the influence of local politics. Of particular concern was the decision to place the institute in the town of Gugging, 45 minutes from Vienna, at the site of a former psychiatric hospital.

Harari, who joined the project in late 2005, insisted that politicians should give the scientific community more control over the project. And although the institute will still be built at Gugging, fears have abated that the distance may make it less attractive as a workplace. Harari says that the campus “has fantastic potential — when you actually go there you can see that”. And the institute may “come to life in a cloistered atmosphere,” suggests physicist Olaf Kübler, chair of the scientific advisory board and former president of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology — ETH Zurich.

Zeilinger has since returned to the scientific board and board of trustees, although he refuses to comment on the political decisions about the location.

The Institute of Science and Technology will have an idyllic setting, replacing an existing psychiatric hospital. Image: INST. SCI. TECH. AUSTRIA

With the decision to proceed now firmly in place, outside observers also see the need to gather leading scientists together. “Now it is necessary for the Institute of Science and Technology to reach a chain-reaction mass, so that it can get on with its work in the absence of closely neighbouring institutes,” says Christoph Kratky, a molecular biologist from the University of Graz and head of the Austrian science fund FWF in Vienna.

The institute will not be part of the existing group of Austrian universities, which is largely seen as overly bureaucratic and not able to offer competitive packages to top scientists.

Germany and Italy, whose universities share the same historical system, have also toyed with the idea of building an elite graduate school from scratch. Germany, however, abandoned the idea in favour of topping up funding of existing universities that perform well, and the Italian Institute of Technology is floundering.

Government and industrial sources are supporting the Austrian project to the tune of 500 million euros over 10 years. If all goes to plan, the institute will eventually employ 500 people. With construction beginning in autumn, scientists who don't need complex equipment are expected to start work next year.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/448112b

Authors

  1. Search for Carina Lenotti in:

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing