Sir
Your Editorial (Nature 436, 152; 2005) related the story of how Nature had to carry out the painstaking task of rounding up and destroying several thousand copies of last November's supplement “China voices II” containing a map of China without Taiwan, then reprinting it with no map. You assured readers that “whether Taiwan is an independent country ... is not an issue on which Nature takes a stand”.
Science recently made a similar clarification — that it has no policy on the Taiwan question — in a published apology by editor-in-chief Donald Kennedy (Science 309, 1677; 2005), following that journal's publication in July of a map of China that included Mongolia but not Hainan and Taiwan.
It is a sad reality that people in some quarters in China might still believe that this omission by two leading science journals represent elements of a concerted move with hidden political motivation, no matter what actions were taken by each journal to claim otherwise.
On the other hand, declaring whether to take a stand on a political issue that has nothing to do with science is a significant political statement in itself, especially when it comes from journals with the stature of Nature and Science.
It is a sad day for science and scientists everywhere when these journals are compelled to explain themselves by making declarations of this kind.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Contributions to Correspondence may be submitted to corres@nature.com. They should be no longer than 500 words, and ideally shorter. They should be signed by no more than three authors; preferably by one. Published contributions are edited.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hsieh, YH. Mapping the complexities of science and politics. Nature 438, 24 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/438024c
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/438024c