Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Insect parasitoid species respond to forest structure at different spatial scales

Abstract

There is now a solid body of theoretical work1–4 demonstrating that the spatial structure of the habitat combined with animal movement strongly influence host–parasitoid dynamics. The spatial pattern over which parasitoid search takes place can be affected by the distribution of the hosts5, by the spatial arrangement of the host's habitat6 and by the spatial scale at which the parasitoid perceives variation in host abundance7,8. Empirical work, however, has been largely restricted to small-scale field studies of less than one hectare6,9 with very few larger10,11. Here we report initial results of a many-year, large-scale study that is among the first to examine the interaction between a population-level process (parasitism) and anthropogenic forest fragmentation at large and at multiple spatial scales. We demonstrate that parasitism by four species of parasitoids attacking the forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria, is significantly reduced or enhanced depending on the proportion of forested to unforested land. Each of the parasitoid species responds to this mosaic at four different spatial scales that correspond to their relative body sizes. Our data give empirical support to the argument that changes in landscape structure can alter the normal functioning of ecological processes such as parasitism, with large-scale population consequences3,4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hassell, M. P. & May, R. M. Spatial heterogeneity and the dynamics of parasitoid-host systems. Ann. Zool. Fennici 25, 55–61 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kareiva, P. Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 330, 175–190 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. May, R. M. in Large-scale Ecology and Conservation Biology (eds Edwards, P. J., May, R. M. & Webb, N. R.) 1–17 (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kareiva, P. & Wennergren, U. Connecting landscape pattern to ecosystem and population processes. Nature 373, 299–302 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Waage, J. K. Aggregation in field parasitoid populations: foraging time allocation by a population of Diadegma (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Ecol. Entomol. 8, 447–453 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kruess, A. & Tscharntke, T. Habitat fragmentation, species loss, and biological control. Science 264, 1581–1584 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heads, P. A. & Lawton, J. H. Studies on the natural enemy complex of the holly leaf-miner: the effects of scale on the detection of aggregative responses and the implications for biological control. Oikos 40, 267–276 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rothman, L. D. & Darling, D. C. Spatial density dependence: effects of scale, host spatial pattern and parasitoid reproductive strategy. Oikos 62, 221–230 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kareiva, P. Habitat fragmentation and the stability of predator-prey interactions. Nature 326, 388–390 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rogers, D. J. & Williams, B. G. in Large-scale Ecology and Conservation Biology (eds Edwards, P. J., May, R. M. & Webb, N. R.) 247–271 (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marino, P. C. & Landis, D. A. Effects of landscape structure on parasitoid diversity and parasitism in agroecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 6, 276–284 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sippell, W. L. Outbreaks of the forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria Hbn., a periodic defoliator of broad-leaved trees in Ontario. Can. Entomol. 94, 408–416 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Witter, J. A. & Kulman, H. M. The parasite complex of the forest tent caterpillar in northern Minnesota. Env. Entomol. 8, 723–731 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Parry, D. Larval and pupal parasitism of the forest-tent caterpillar Malacosoma disstria Hübner (Lepidoptera, Lasiocampidae) in Alberta, Canada. Can. Entomol 127, 877–893 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Godfray, H. C. J. Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roland, J. Large-scale forest fragmentation increases the duration of forest tent caterpillar outbreak. Oecologia 93, 25–30 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roland, J. & Taylor, P. D. in Population Dynamics: New Approaches and Synthesis (eds Cappuccino, N. & Price, P. W.) 195–208 (Academic, San Diego, 1995).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Weseloh, R. M. Spatial distribution of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) and some of its parisitoids within a forest environment. Entomophaga 17, 339–351 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Holling, C. S. Cross-scale morphology, geometry and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 62, 447–502 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McCullagh, P. & Nelder, G. A. Generalized Linear Models (Chapman & Hall, London, 1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilkinson, L., Hill, M., Miceli, S., Birkenbeuel, G. & Vang, E. SYSTAT for Windows: V.5 (Evanston, Illinois, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roland, J., Taylor, P. Insect parasitoid species respond to forest structure at different spatial scales. Nature 386, 710–713 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/386710a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/386710a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing