Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Spin-up and recovery in the 1989 glitch of the Crab pulsar

Abstract

THE rotation of the Crab pulsar, as measured by pulsed radio and optical emission, has been monitored almost continuously since its discovery in 1968. A steady decrease in the rotation rate has been interrupted at intervals of about five years by glitches: discontinuous increases in rotation speed followed by partial recovery in the form of an exponential return to a new slowdown rate on a timescale of about 20 days. The recovery is usually interpreted as the re-establishment of stable differential rotation between the neutron star crust and part of its superfluid interior. Here we describe the largest glitch so far recorded in the Crab pulsar1. It occurred in 1989 while observations were being made, and the recovery was followed in unprecedented detail. The spin-up itself was also partly resolved in time, and the whole event, glitch plus recovery, is now seen to include three distinct exponential components, with timescales of 1, 20 and 300 days. The physical interpretation of these distinct components is unclear. The 1989 glitch, like the 1975 one2, caused a permanent increase in the slowdown rate, of a magnitude that is difficult to reconcile with current neutron star models.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lyne, A. G. & Pritchard, R. S. IAU Circ. No. 4845 (1989).

  2. Demianski, M. & Proszynski, M. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 202, 437–451 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lyne, A. G., Pritchard, R. S. & Smith, F. G. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 233, 667–676 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boynton, P. E., Groth, E. J., Partridge, R. B. & Williamson, D. T. IAU Circ. No. 2179 (1969).

  5. Lohsen, E. Nature 258, 688–689 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lyne, A. G. & Pritchard, R. S. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 229, 223 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Standish, E. M. J. Astr. Astrophys. 114, 297–302 (1982).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. McCulloch, P. M., Hamilton, P. A., McConnell, D. & King, E. A. Nature 346, 822–824 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pines, D. & Alpar, M. A. Nature 316, 27–32 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyne, A., Smith, F. & Pritchard, R. Spin-up and recovery in the 1989 glitch of the Crab pulsar. Nature 359, 706–707 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/359706a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/359706a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing