Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Fitness consequences of foraging behaviour in the zebra finch

Abstract

OPTIMAL foraging theory is based on the assumption that natural selection favours animals that forage most efficiently1–3. But such selection does not act directly on foraging efficiency, but rather indirectly by favouring animals that survive and reproduce most successfully. Studies that use optimal foraging models often assume that maximization of some behavioural currency, such as the animal's net rate of energy gain, maximizes the animal's fitness4, but rarely is an attempt made to test this assumption5–8. Most studies of the effects of foraging behaviour on fitness fail to control for the amount of energy gained by the foraging animals5–8, and lead to the obvious conclusion that animals that eat more reproduce more. Often the studies do not control for characters correlated with foraging behaviour6 or compare traits assumed to be correlated with fitness7,8. A better method would be to assign net rates of energy gain to randomly chosen individuals for their entire lifetimes in a controlled environment and measure fitness directly. Variation in the amount of energy consumed would be controlled by using individuals that employ a time-minimizing foraging strategy9 and would alter the time taken to satisfy their daily energy requirements, while obtaining the same absolute amount of energy. I have now manipulated the net rate of energy gain in four populations of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata, and show that fitness, as measured by population growth rate, is indeed positively and significantly correlated with the net rate of energy gain.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krebs, J. R. in Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 22–63 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pyke, G. H. A. Rev Ecol. Syst. 15, 523–575 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stephens, D. W. & Krebs, J. R. Foraging Theory (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schoener, T. W. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2, 396–404 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wise, D. H. Oecologia 41, 289–300 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fritz, R. S. & Morse, D. H. Oecologia 65, 194–200 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ritchie, M. E. Evol. Ecology 2, 232–252 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ritchie, M. E. Oecologia 82, 56–67 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hixon, M. A. Am. Nat. 119, 569–599 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Benkman, C. W. Auk 107, 376–386 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benkman, C. W. & Pulliam, H. R. Ecology 69, 1195–1199 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sullivan, K. A. Anim. Behav. 39, 380–387 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F., Biometry (Freeman, San Francisco, 1981).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller, B. G., Kirkwood, J. K., Howard, K., Tuddenham, A. & Webster, A. J. F. Lab. Anim. 51, 313–317 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hails, C. J. Condor 85, 61–65 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Caswell, H. Matrix Population Models (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cooper, W. S. J. theor. Biol. 107, 603–629 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meyer, J. S., Ingersoll, C. G., McDonald, L. L. & Boyce, M. S. Ecology 67, 1156–1166 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morrison, M. L., Ralph, C. J., Verner, J. & Jehl, J. R. Studies Avian Biol. 13, 1–515 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lemon, W. Fitness consequences of foraging behaviour in the zebra finch. Nature 352, 153–155 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/352153a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/352153a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing