Professor Mark Ptashne describes evidence to explain the disputed Cell paper, Dr Herman N Eisen (who conducted the MIT inquiry in 1986) concurs, Dr John Cairns (in letter to an unidentified official of the US National Academy) says the affair is the equivalent of Watergate and a former co-worker offers a testimonal to Imanishi-Kari.
Article PDF
References
Eisen, H. Nature 351, 343 (1991).
Weaver, D., Reis, M. H., Albarese, C., Costantini, F., Baltimore, D. & Imanishi Kari, F. Cell 45, 247–259 (1986).
Durdick, J. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 2346–2350 (1989).
Rath, S., Durdick J., Gerstein, R. M., Selsing, E. & Nisonoff, A. J. Immun. 113, 2074–2080 (1989).
O'Toole, M. Nature 351, 180–183 (1991).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
More views on Imanishi-Kari. Nature 352, 101 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/352101a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/352101a0