Abstract
THE prediction of the structure of inorganic crystalline solids from the knowledge of their chemical composition is still a largely unresolved problem1–3. The usual approach to this problem is to minimize, for a selection of candidate models, the potential energy of the system with respect to the structural parameters of these models: the solution is the arrangement that comes out lowest in energy. Methods using this procedure may differ in the origin (ab initio or empirical) of the interatomic potentials used, but they usually restrict themselves to optimizing a structural arrangement within the constraints of given symmetry and bond topology. As a result, they do not truly address the problem of predicting the unknown structure of a real compound. The method we describe here is an attempt at solving the following problem: given the chemical composition of a crystalline compound and the values of its unit-cell parameters, find its structure (topology and bond distances) by optimizing the arrangement of ions, atoms or molecules in accordance with a set of prescribed rules. The procedure uses simple, empirical crystal chemistry arguments (Pauling's principles for ionic compounds4) and a powerful stochastic search procedure, known as simulated annealing5 to identify the best atomic model or models. We discuss the potential of the method for structure determination and refinement, using results obtained for several known inorganic structures, and by the determination of a previously unknown structure. Although the approach is limited to the case of inorganic compounds, it is nevertheless very general, and would apply to any crystalline structure provided that the principles governing the architecture of the solid can be properly described.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Maddox, J. Nature 335, 201 (1988).
DiSalvo, F. J. Science 247, 649–655 (1990).
Hawthorne, F. C. Nature 345, 297 (1990).
Pauling, L. J. Am. chem. Soc. 51, 1010–1026 (1929).
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D. & Vecchi, M. P. Science 220, 671–680 (1983).
Brown, I. D. in Structure and Bonding (eds O'Keeffe, M. & Navrotsky, A.) Vol. 2, 1–30 (Academic, New York, 1981).
Brown, I. D. Z. Kristallogr. 185, 503 (1988).
Meier, W. M. & Villiger, H. Z. Kristallogr. 129, 411–423 (1969).
Deem, M. W. & Newsam, J. M. Nature 342, 260–262 (1989).
Van Laarhoven, P. J. M. & Aarts, E. H. L. Simulated Annealing (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987).
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A., Rosenbluth, M., Teller, A. & Teller, E. J. chem. Phys. 21, 1087–1091 (1953).
Fleurette-Delobbe, V., thesis, Univ. Paris VI (1987).
Lacorre, P., thesis, Univ. Maine (1988).
Lacorre, P., Pannetier, J., Hoppe, R., Averdunk, F. & Ferey, G. J. Solid St. Chem. 79, 1–11 (1989).
Lacorre, P. & Pannetier, J. J. Magn. & magn. Mater. 71, 63–82 (1987).
Hoppe, R. et al. J. less-common Metals 156, 105–122 (1990).
Mackay, A. L. & Finney, J. L. J. appl. Crystallogr. 6, 284–289 (1973).
O'Keeffe, M. Struct. Bonding 71, 162–190 (1989).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pannetier, J., Bassas-Alsina, J., Rodriguez-Carvajal, J. et al. Prediction of crystal structures from crystal chemistry rules by simulated annealing. Nature 346, 343–345 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/346343a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/346343a0
This article is cited by
-
Recent advances in machine learning interatomic potentials for cross-scale computational simulation of materials
Science China Materials (2024)
-
A Continuous Action Space Tree search for INverse desiGn (CASTING) framework for materials discovery
npj Computational Materials (2023)
-
Faux-Data Injection Optimization for Accelerating Data-Driven Discovery of Materials
Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation (2023)
-
Crystal structure prediction by combining graph network and optimization algorithm
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Structure prediction drives materials discovery
Nature Reviews Materials (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.