Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Reassessment of comparative evidence for Hamilton and Zuk theory on the evolution of secondary sexual characters

Abstract

HAMILTON and Zuk1 proposed that elaborate secondary sexual characters may have evolved because they act as cues in mate choice by revealing the health of a potential mate. From this theory, they derived the prediction that species which are more liable to parasitic infection should possess well-developed secondary sexual characters. They went on to demonstrate a positive association between prevalence of haematozoa and plumage brightness across species of North American passerine birds. Subsequent analyses by one of us2 on the same colour data confirmed that the relationship with male brightness existed even when the effects of phylogenetic associations were taken into account. The relationship was also found across European passerines when behavioural and ecological correlates of colour and phytogeny were accounted for2. Here, using independently derived plumage brightness scores, we question these conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. Science 218, 384–387 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Read, A. F. Nature 327, 68–70 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Field Guide to the Birds of North America, 2nd edn (National Geographic Society, Washington, 1987).

  4. Ridley, M. The Explanation of Organic Diversity (Clarendon, Oxford, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pagel, M. D. & Harvey, P. H. Q. Rev. Biol. 63, 413–440 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, R. R. & Parker, G. A. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 287, 63–130 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peterson, R., Mountfort, G. & Hollom P. A. D. A Field Guide to the Birds of Britain and Europe. 4th edn (Collins, London, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Read, A. F. in Parasitism and Host Behaviour (eds Barnard, C. J. & Behnke, M.) (Taylor and Francis, London, in the press).

  9. Harvey, P. H., Read, A. F., John, J. L., Gregory, R. & Keymer, A. E. in Parasitism: Coexistence or Conflict? (eds Aeschlimann, A. & Toft, C.) (Oxford University Press, in the press).

  10. Zuk, M. in Ecology, Behaviour and Evolution of Bird-Parasite Interactions (eds Loye, J. E., Van Riper, C., & Zuk, M.) (Oxford University Press, in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Read, A., Harvey, P. Reassessment of comparative evidence for Hamilton and Zuk theory on the evolution of secondary sexual characters. Nature 339, 618–620 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/339618a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/339618a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing