Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

What price space-based interceptors?

The Marshall Institute advocates that the United States should deploy space-based missile interceptors in the near future. At best such weapons would not be cost effective, at worst they would be useless.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Report of the Technical Panel on Deployment of Missile Defense in the 1990s (George C. Marshall Institute, Washington, DC, 1987).

  2. The President's Strategic Defense Initiative (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, January 1985).

  3. Nitze, P. H. in Strategic Defense Initiative: Folly or Future (eds Haley, P. E. & Merritt, J.) 37–43 (Westview Press, Boulder, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Strategic Defense Initiative (Spec. Rep. No. 129) (US Department of State Bureau of Public Affairs, Washington, DC, 1985).

  5. Blechman, B. M. & Utgoff, V. A. Fiscal and Economic Implications of Strategic Defences (School of Advanced International Studies Papers in International Affairs No. 12) (Westview Press, Boulder, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cochran, T. B., Arkin, W. M. & Hoenig, M. M. Nuclear Weapon Databook, Volume I: Nuclear Forces and Capabilities (Ballinger, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gallaton, S. & Dolan, P. J. The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, 3rd edn (US Department of Defense, Washington, DC, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, B. A. Aviat. Week Space Technol. p. 54, 6 Feb. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Soviet Military Power, 5th edn (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1986).

  10. Ballistic Missile Defense Technology (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, September 1985).

  11. Brower, M. Nucleus, 9(2), 1 (1987).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Short Burn-time ICBM Characteristics and Considerations (Martin Marietta Denver Aerospace, Denver, Colorado, 20 July 1983).

  13. Deitz, B. Fast-Burn Missile Requirements Analysis (Lockheed Missiles and Space, Sunnyvale, California, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carter, A. B. Directed Energy Missile Defense in Space (Background pap. for Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC, April 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Field, G. B. & Spergel, D. N. Science 231, 1387 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Report to the APS of the Study Group on Science and Technology of Directed Energy Weapons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, S1 (1987).

  17. Cunningham, C., Energy and Technical Review 16 (Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, July 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garwin, R. Nature 315, 286 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, A. & Vetterling, W. T. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spergel, D., Field, G. What price space-based interceptors?. Nature 333, 813–815 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/333813a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/333813a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing