Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Evidence of bias in estimations of earthquake size

Abstract

Magnitudes of earthquakes determined using traditional methods show systematic deviations, dependent on tectonic setting, from accurate estimates of earthquake size. Magnitudes are overestimated for most of the continental earthquakes, underestimated for mid-oceanic ridges and differences of varying sign are obtained for subduction zones. This is important in evaluating the seismic risk or consideration of effects such as the seismic versus aseismic strain release as seismic moments determined from magnitudes can be wrong by as much as a factor of four.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Richter, C. F. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 25, 1–32 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vanek, J. et al. Izv. akad. Nauk. USSR, Ser. Geophys. 2, 153–158 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aki, K. Bull Earthqu. Res. lnst. Tokyo Univ. 44, 23–88 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Agnew, D., Berger, J., Buland, R., Farrell, W. & Gilbert, F. Eos 57, 280–288 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peterson, J., Butler, H. M., Holcomb, L. G. & Hutt, C. R. Bull seism. Soc. Am. 66, 2049–2068 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kanamori, H. & Given, J. W. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 27, 8–31 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dziewonski, A. M., Chou, T. A. & Woodhouse, J. H. J. geophys. Res. 86, 2825–2852 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Woodhouse, J. H. & Dziewonski, A. M. J. geophys. Res. 88, 3247–3271 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Woodhouse, J. H. & Dziewonski, A. M. J. geophys. Res. 89, 5953–5986 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dziewonski, A. M., Franzen, J. E. & Woodhouse, J. H. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 34, 209–219 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dziewonski, A. M., Ekström, G., Franzen, J. E. & Woodhouse, J. H. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 45, 11–36 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dziewonski, A. M., Ekström, G., Woodhouse, J. H. & Zwart, G. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. (in the press).

  13. Kanamori, H. J. geophys. Res. 82, 2981–2987 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Richter, C. F. Elementary Seismology (W. H. Freeman, San Fransisco, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lienkamper, J. J. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 74, 2357–2378 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kanamori, H. Anderson, D. L. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 65, 1073–1095 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ekström, G. & Dziewonski, A. M. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 75, 23–39 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sipkin, S. A. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 76, 1515–1541 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harkrider, D. G. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 54, 627–679 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gutenberg, B. & Richter, C. F. Gerlands Beitr. z. Geophysik 47, 73–131 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gutenberg, B. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 35, 3–12 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Von Seggern, D. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 60, 503–516 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nuttli, O. Tectonophysics 118, 161–174 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kanamori, H. & Allen, C. R. in Maurice Ewing Series Vol. 6, Earthquake Source Mechanics (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhuo, T. & Kanamori, H. Bull seism. Soc. Am. 77, 514–529 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekström, G., Dziewonski, A. Evidence of bias in estimations of earthquake size. Nature 332, 319–323 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/332319a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/332319a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing