Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Communication
  • Published:

Production scale-up and validation of packaging cell clearance of clinical-grade retroviral vector stocks produced in Cell Factories

Abstract

The clinical implementation of gene therapy requires large-scale production of viral vector stocks (VS) derived from packaging cell lines. Upon scaling-up, maintenance of high viral titers and filtration of the VS become significantly challenging. Thus, production schemes amenable to straightforward validation must be developed. To this end, we have established a semi-closed process to manufacture batches of 7 l or more of clinical-grade oncoretroviral VS using 10-tray Cell Factories. Using a peristaltic pump, the VS are collected on 3 consecutive days, filtered, pooled and stored frozen. To ensure the absence of viable vector-producing cells (VPCs) from each VS unit-dose, we undertook an orthogonal log-removal validation study to demonstrate the ability of both the filtration system to remove viable cells and the VS freezing process to inactivate them. We demonstrate a total VPC-reduction of 11.6 log, thus insuring the absence of contaminating VPCs in transduced clinical samples. We also show that this production process generates stable VS that can be stored at −80°C for more than 3 years. Importantly, this relatively simple and affordable process can be customized to generating large volume of VS for small animal or non-human primate studies. This methodology is not limited to the generation of cell-free clinical oncoretroviral VS, and can be applied to other types of vectors produced in packaging cell lines, such as lentiviral vectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Points to Consider in the Production and Testing of New Drugs and Biologicals Produced by Recombinant DNA Technology. Rockville, MD, 1985.

  2. Kotani H, Newton PB, Zhang S, Chiang YL, Otto E, Weaver L et al. Improved methods of retroviral vector transduction and production for gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther 1994; 5: 19–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sheridan PL, Bodner M, Lynn A, Phuong TK, DePolo NJ, de la Vega Jr DJ et al. Generation of retroviral packaging and producer cell lines for large-scale vector production and clinical application: improved safety and high titer. Mol Ther 2000; 2: 262–275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Merten O-W, Cruz PE, Rochette C, Geny-Fiamma C, Bouquet C, Goncalves D et al. Comparison of different bioreactor systems for the production of high titer retroviral vectors. Biotechnol Progr 2001; 17: 326–335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pan D, Whitley CB . Closed hollow-fiber bioreactor: a new approach to retroviral vector production. J Gene Med 1999; 1: 433–440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eckert HG, Kuhlcke K, Schilz AJ, Lindemann C, Basara N, Fauser AA et al. Clinical scale production of an improved retroviral vector expressing the human multidrug resistance 1 gene (MDR1). Bone Marrow Transplan 2000; 25: S114–S117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schilz AJ, Kuhlcke K, Fauser AA, Eckert HG . Optimization of retroviral vector generation for clinical application. J Gene Med 2001; 3: 427–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Reeves L, Cornetta K . Clinical retroviral vector production: step filtration using clinically approved filters improves titers. Gene Therapy 2000; 7: 1993–1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller AD, Garcia JV, von Suhr N, Lynch CM, Wilson C, Eiden MV . Construction and properties of retrovirus packaging cells based on gibbon ape leukemia virus. J Virol 1991; 65: 2220–2224.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wikstrom K, Blomberg P, Islam KB . Clinical grade vector production: analysis of yield, stability, and storage of GMP-produced retroviral vectors for gene therapy. Biotechnol Progr 2004; 20: 1198–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gallardo HF, Tan C, Sadelain M . The internal ribosomal entry site of the encephalomyocarditis virus enables reliable coexpression of two transgenes in human primary T lymphocytes. Gene Therapy 1997; 4: 1115–1119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koehne G, Gallardo HF, Sadelain M, O’Reilly RJ . Rapid selection of antigen-specific T lymphocytes by retroviral transduction. Blood 2000; 96: 109–117.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gallardo HF, Tan C, Ory D, Sadelain M . Recombinant retroviruses pseudotyped with the vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein mediate both stable gene transfer and pseudotransduction in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Blood 1997; 90: 952–957.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. MacNeill EC, Hanenberg H, Pollok KE, van der Loo JC, Bierhuizen MF, Wagemaker G et al. Simultaneous infection with retroviruses pseudotyped with different envelope proteins bypasses viral receptor interference associated with colocalization of gp70 and target cells on fibronectin CH-296. J Virol 1999; 73: 3960–3967.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. US Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Points to Consider in the Manufacture and Testing of Monoclonal Antibody Products for Human Use. Rockville, MD, 1997.

  16. Slepushkin V, Chang N, Cohen R, Gan Y, Jian B, Deausen E et al. Large-scale purification of a lentiviral vector by size exclusion chromatography or Mustang Q ion exchange capsule. Bioprocess J 2003; 2: 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. US Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Points to Consider in the Characterization of Cell Lines Used to Produce Biologicals. Rockville, MD, 1993.

  18. US Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Guidance for Industry: Guidance for Human Somatic Cell Therapy and Gene Therapy. Rockville, MD, 1998.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by US National Institutes of Health Grants CA-59350, CA-08748, HL66952 and by Mr William H Goodwin and Mrs Alice Goodwin and the Commonwealth Cancer Foundation for Research & the Experimental Therapeutics Center of MSKCC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I Rivière.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Przybylowski, M., Hakakha, A., Stefanski, J. et al. Production scale-up and validation of packaging cell clearance of clinical-grade retroviral vector stocks produced in Cell Factories. Gene Ther 13, 95–100 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3302648

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3302648

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links