Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Transgene expression, but not gene delivery, is improved by adhesion-assisted lipofection of hematopoietic cells

Gene Therapy volume 6, pages 931–938 (1999)Cite this article

Abstract

In contrast to adherent cells, cells growing in suspension and particularly hematopoietic cells, are notoriously difficult to transfect in vitro using nonviral approaches. In the present study, the effect of cell adhesion on gene transfer efficacy was investigated by allowing hematopoietic cells to bind to an adherent cell monolayer (ACM) before being subjected to cationic liposome-mediated DNA transfer. Human CD34 and T CD4 cell lines were cultivated on an ACM constituted of murine fibroblast NIH3T3 cells and transfected with a plasmid carrying the β-galactosidase gene. X-gal staining showed that up to 27% of the cells expressed the transgene. In contrast, less than 0.1% of these cells were positively transfected in suspension. This adhesion-assisted lipofection (AAL) procedure was also successfully tested on blood lymphocytes, since it resulted in up to 30% of transfected human primary T lymphocytes. Flow cytometry analysis performed on T lymphocyte subsets revealed that 8 and 9%, respectively, of CD4 and CD8 cells could be transfected with a plasmid carrying the green fluorescent protein gene. Other adherent cells, such as MS5 murine stromal cells or HeLa epithelial cells, were also a compatible matrix for AAL. Moreover, the pCMVβ plasmid was present in similar amounts in the nuclei of TF1 cells transfected in suspension or with the AAL procedure. These data raise the possibility that cell matrix/ hematopoietic cell interactions might govern expression of the transgene in hematopoietic cells growing usually in suspension, but not endocytosis of liposome/DNA particles and plasmid migration to the cell nucleus.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Felgner PL et al. Lipofection: a highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA transfection procedure Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987 84: 7413–7417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Felgner PL, Ringold GM . Cationic liposome-mediated transfection Nature 1989 337: 387–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Felgner JH et al. Enhanced gene delivery and mechanism studies with a novel series of cationic lipid formulation J Biol Chem 1994 269: 2550–2561

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart MJ et al. Gene transfer in vivo with DNA–liposome complexes: safety and acute toxicity in mice Hum Gene Ther 1992 3: 267–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hawley-Nelson P et al. Lipofectamine reagent: a new, higher efficiency polycationic liposome transfection reagent Focus 1993 15: 73–79

    Google Scholar 

  6. Labat-Moleur F et al. An electron microscopy study into the mechanism of gene transfer with lipopolyamines Gene Therapy 1996 3: 1010–1017

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harrison GS et al. Optimization of gene transfer using cationic lipids in cell lines and primary human CD34+ and CD34+ hematopoietic cells Bio Techniques 1995 19: 816–823

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aksentijevich I et al. In vitro and in vivo liposome-mediated gene transfer leads to human MDR1 expression in mouse bone marrow progenitor cells Hum Gene Ther 1996 7: 1111–1122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Behr JP . Gene transfer with synthetic cationic amphiphiles: prospects for gene therapy Bioconj Chem 1994 5: 382–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou XH, Huang L . DNA transfection mediated by cationic liposomes containing lipopolylysine characterization and mechanism of action Biochim Biophys Acta 1994 1189: 195–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friend DS, Papahadjopoulos D, Debs RJ . Endocytosis and intracellular processing accompanying transfection mediated by cationic liposomes Biochim Biophys Acta 1996 1278: 41–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Behr JP, Demeneix B, Loeffler JP, Perez-Mutul J . Efficient gene transfer into mammalian primary endocrine cells with lipopolyamine-coated DNA Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989 86: 6982–6986

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Barthel F, Remy JS, Loeffler JP, Behr JP . Gene transfer optimization with lipospermine-coated DNA DNA Cell Biol 1993 6: 553–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zabner J et al. Cellular and molecular barrier to gene transfer by a cationic lipid J Biol Chem 1995 270: 18997–19007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Farhood H, Serbina N, Huang L . The role of phosphatidylethanolamine in cationic liposome mediated gene transfer Biochim Biophys Acta 1995 1235: 289–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fasbender A et al. Effect of co-lipids in enhancing cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer in vitro and in vivo Gene Therapy 1997 4: 716–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moritz T, Patel VP, Williams DA . Bone marrow extracellular matrix molecules improve gene transfer into human hematopoietic cells via retroviral vectors J Clin Invest 1994 93: 1451–1457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu LC et al. Growth factors and stromal support generate very efficient retroviral transduction of peripheral blood CD34+ cells from Gaucher patients Blood 1995 86: 141–146

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moore KA et al. Stromal support enhances cell-free retroviral vector transduction of human bone marrow long-term culture-initiating cells Blood 1992 79: 1393–1399

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bordignon C et al. Gene therapy in peripheral blood lymphocytes and bone marrow for ADA-immunodeficient patients Science 1995 270: 470–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hanenberg H et al. colocalization of retrovirus and target cells on specific fibronectin fragments increases genetic transduction of mammalian cells Nature Med 1996 2: 876–882

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moritz T et al. Fibronectin improves transduction of reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells by retroviral vectors: evidence of direct viral binding to chymotryptic carboxy-terminal fragments Blood 1996 88: 855–862

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Logan JL et al. Cationic lipids for reporter gene and CFTR transfer to rat pulmonary epithelium Gene Therapy 1995 2: 38–49

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dowty ME, Williams PW, Zhang G, Wolff JA . Plasmid DNA entry into post-mitotic nuclei of primary rat myotubes Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995 92: 4572–4576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bebok Z et al. Efficiency of plasmid delivery and expression after lipid-mediated gene transfer to human cells in vitro J Pharm Exp Ther 1996 279: 1462–1469

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kobari L et al. Hematopoietic promoting activity of the murine stromal cell line MS-5 is not related to the expression of the major hematopoietic cytokines J Cell Physiol 1995 163: 295–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu LC et al. Long-term in vivo expression of the human glucocerebrosidase gene in nonhuman primate after CD34+ hematopoietic cell transduction with cell-free retroviral vector preparations Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995 92: 4372–4376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Goncalves F et al. Stromal cells maintain the radioprotective capacity of CFU-S during retroviral infection Gene Therapy 1996 3: 761–768

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gordon MY . Stromal cells negatively regulate primitive haemopoietic progenitor cell activation via phosphatidyl inisitol-anchored cell adhesion/signaling mechanism Br J Haematol 1997 96: 647–653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Koeffler HP et al. An undifferentiated variant derived from the human acute myelogenous leukemia cell line (KG-1) Blood 1980 56: 265–273

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kitamura T et al. Establishment and characterization of a unique human cell line that proliferates dependently on GM-CSF, IL-3 or erythropoietin J Cell Physiol 1989 140: 323–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bagnis C et al. Retroviral transfer of the nlsLacZ gene into human CD34+ cell populations and into TF-1 cells: future prospects in gene therapy Hum Gene Ther 1994 5: 1325–1333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Itoh K et al. Reproducible establishment of haemopoietic supportive stromal cell lines from murine bone marrow Exp Hematol 1989 17: 143–153

    Google Scholar 

  34. Issaad C et al. A murine stromal cell line allows the proliferation of very primitive human CD34+, CD38− progenitor cells in long-term cultures and semisolid assays Blood 1993 81: 2916–2924

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. MacGregor GR, Mogg AE, Burke JF, Caskey CT . Histochemical staining of clonal mammalian cell lines expressing E. coli beta galactosidase indicates heterogeneous expression of the bacterial gene Somat Cell Mol Genet 1987 13: 253–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lin WC, Culp LA . Selectable plasmid vectors with alternative and ultrasensitive histochemical marker genes Bio Techniques 1991 11: 344–351

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bagnis C et al. Leukemogenicity of v-myb transformed monoblasts cells can be modulated by normal bone marrow environment Oncogene 1993 8: 737–743

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ozato K, Mayer NM, Sachs DH . Monoclonal antibodies to mouse major histocompatibility complex antigens Transplantation 1982 34: 113–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Département d’Immunologie, Unité d’Immunogénétique Cellulaire, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

    H Keller, J Thèze & P Froussard

  2. Laboratoire de Greffe de Moelle, URA CNRS 5540, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux, Bordeaux, 2, France

    C Yunxu, G Marit & J Reiffers

  3. Immunogénétique de la souris, U93 INSERM, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France

    M Pla

Authors
  1. H Keller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C Yunxu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G Marit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M Pla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J Reiffers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J Thèze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. P Froussard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keller, H., Yunxu, C., Marit, G. et al. Transgene expression, but not gene delivery, is improved by adhesion-assisted lipofection of hematopoietic cells. Gene Ther 6, 931–938 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3300896

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3300896

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links