Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Occurrence of a predicted earthquake on the San Andreas fault

Abstract

In May 1985 we predicted1 that an earthquake would occur on the San Andreas fault near Stone Canyon, California within a year. The prediction was based on the observation of seismic quiescence–defined as a significant decrease in the average occurrence rate of earthquakes within the source volume of the future mainshock. A mainshock of magnitude ML = 4.6 occurred on 31 May 1986, rupturing exactly the specified segment of the fault. This is the first successful prediction of an earthquake along the San Andreas fault, and the probability to have come true by chance is <5%. Although the prediction addressed only a small main-shock, its success was significant because the location, size and occurrence time were correctly specified for an earthquake in a populated area. Larger earthquakes will undoubtedly be successfully predicted by the same method in the future, but the major segments of the San Andreas fault near San Francisco and Los Angeles have such a low-background seismicity rate that the method will probably not be applicable there.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wyss, M. & Burford, R. O. US Geol. Surv. open file report, 85–745, 376–426 (1985).

  2. Mogi, K. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Tokyo, Univ. 47, 395–417 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ohtake, M., Matumoto, T. & Latham, G. V. Pure appl. Geophys. 115, 375–386 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wyss, M. Earthq. Predict. Res. 3, 519–543 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wyss, M. & Habermann, R. E. US Geol. Surv. open file report (1986).

  6. Kisslinger, C., McDonald, C. & Bowman, J. R. Proc. IASPEI General Assembly, Tokyo, 32, (1985).

  7. Bakun, W. H. & Lindh, A. G. Science 229, 619–624 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wyss, M. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 76, 785–800 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wyss, M. & Habermann, R. E. US Geological Survey open file report (1986).

  10. Habermann, R. E. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 72, 93–112 (1982); J. geophys. Res. 88, 5056–5064 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Habermann, R. E. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 76, 1660–1667 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reasenberg, P. J. geophys. Res. 90, 5479–5495 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wyss, M., Klein, F. W. & Johnston, A. C. J. geophys. Res. 86, 3881–3900 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Haberman, R. E. Earthquake Prediction, Maurice Ewing Series Vol. 4, 29–42 (American Geophysics Union, Washington, DC, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wyss, M., Habermann, R. E. & Griesser, J. C. J. geophys. Res. 89, 9293–9304 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Burford, R. O., Schulz, S. S. US Geol. Surv. open file report, 85–754, 294–315 (1985).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wyss, M., Burford, R. Occurrence of a predicted earthquake on the San Andreas fault. Nature 329, 323–325 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/329323a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/329323a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing