Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Temporal changes in microseismicity and creep near Parkfield, California

Abstract

The 25-km-long section of the San Andreas fault near Parkfield, California ruptured in similar magnitude-6 earthquakes in 1881, 1901, 1922, 1934 and 1966. On the basis of a number of lines of seismological evidence, a section of the San Andreas fault, now termed the Parkfield preparation zone, has been identified as the locus of the next Parkfield earthquake1,3. Here we describe coincident changes in surface creep rates and deep seismicity near the Parkfield preparation zone following the 2 May 1983 Coalinga earthquake, and suggest that both respond to the same stimuli. These changes were concentrated near the point of initiation of the magnitude-6 characteristic Parkfield earthquakes, lending credence to the hypothesis that this section of the San Andreas fault is characterized by a unique set of physical properties4–6 which make it ideal for earthquake prediction studies and which may also be useful for identifying hypocentral regions in other areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 1. Bakun, W. H. & McEvilly, T. V. /. geophys. Res. 89, 3051–3058 (1984). 2. Bakun, W. H. & Lindh, A. G. Earthquake Pred. Res. 3, 285–304 (1985). 3. Shearer, C. F. U.S. geol. Surv. Open–File Report 85–201 (1985). 4. Schulz, S. S., Mavko, G. M. & Brown, B. D. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv. (in the press). 5. King, G. Pure appl. Geophys. 121, 761–815 (1983). 6. Lindh, A. G. & Boore, D. M. Bull seism. Sac. Am. 71, 95–116 (1981). 7. Schulz, S. S., Mavko, G. M., Burford, R. O. & Stuart, W. D. /. geophys. Res. 87, B6977–B6982 (1982). 8. Eaton, J. P., O'Neill, M. E. & Murdock, J. N. Bull, seism. Soc. Am. 60, 1151–1197 (1970). 9. Bakun, W. H. & Lindh, A. G. Science 229, 619–624 (1985). 10. Moths, B. L., Lindh, A. G., Ellsworth, W. L. & Fluty, L. Eos 62, 958 (1981). 11. Olson, J. A. Bull. R. Soc. N.Z. 24, 87–97 (1986). 12. Bolt, B. A. Bull, seism. Soc. Am. 50, 457–471 (1968). 13. Lindh, A. G. & Jones, L. Eos 66, 982 (1985). 14. Poley, C. M., Lindh, A. G. & Bakun, W. H. Earthquake Not. 57, 21 (1986). 15. O'Neill, M. E. Bull seism. Soc. Am. 74, 27–40 (1984). 16. Schulz, S. S. & Burford, R. O. Eos 66, 985 (1985). 17. Mavko, G., Schulz, S. S. & Brown, B. D. Bull, seism. Soc. Am. 75, 475–489 (1985). 18. Stuart, W. p., Archuleta, R. J. & Lindh, A. G. /. geophys. Res. 90, 595–604 (1985). 19. Tse, S. T., Dmowska, R. & Rice, J. R. Bull, seism. Soc. Am. 75, 709–736 (1985).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poley, C., Lindh, A., Bakun, W. et al. Temporal changes in microseismicity and creep near Parkfield, California. Nature 327, 134–137 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/327134a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/327134a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing