Abstract
The ability to detect, discriminate and identify spatial stimuli is much poorer in the peripheral than in the central visual field. Some deficits are eliminated by scaling stimulus size. For example, grating detectibility is roughly constant across the visual field when spatial frequency and target extent are scaled appropriately1,2. Other deficits persist despite scaling. For instance, some readily detectable patterns are more difficult to identify peripherally than in the fovea3,4. This deficit is caused, at least partially, by a reduced ability to encode spatial phase (or relative position)5–7. To specify the properties of foveal and peripheral phase-encoding mechanisms, we measured discrimination thresholds for compound gratings at several eccentricities. Our observations are consistent with a two-channel model of phase encoding based on even- and odd-symmetric mechanisms8 (see Fig. 1), but the sensitivity of the odd-symmetric mechanisms decreases dramatically with eccentricity. Thus, the loss of sensitivity in one type of mechanism may underlie the reduced ability to encode spatial phase peripherally.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rovamo, J., Virsu, V. & Nasanen, R. Nature 271, 54–56 (1978).
Koenderink, J. J., Bouman, M. A., Bueno de Mesquita, A. E. & Slappendel, S. J. opt. Soc. Am. 68, 854–860 (1978).
Merchant, J. J. opt. Soc. Am. 55, 1291–1295 (1965).
Loomis, J. Vision Res. 18, 335–338 (1978).
Julesz, B. Nature 290, 91–97 (1981).
Braddick, O. Documenta ophth. Proc. Series 30, 255–262 (1981).
Rentschler, I. & Treutwein, B. Nature 313, 308–310 (1985).
Field, D. J. & Nachmias, J. Vision Res. 24, 333–340 (1984).
Stromeyer, C. F. & Julesz, B. J. opt. Soc. Am. 62, 1221–1232 (1972).
Nachmias, J. & Weber, A. Vision Res. 15, 217–224 (1975).
Tolhurst, D. J. & Barfield, L. P. Vision Res. 18, 951–958 (1978).
Levi, D. M., Klein, S. A. & Aitsebaomo, A. P. Vision Res. 25, 963–977 (1985).
Livingston, M. S. & Hubel, D. H. Nature 315, 285 (1985).
Watt, R. J. Nature 313, 266–267 (1985).
Stromeyer, C. F. & Klein, S. Vision Res. 14, 1409–1420 (1974).
Stromeyer, C. F., Lange, A. F. & Ganz, L. Vision Res. 13, 2345–2360 (1973).
Shapley, R. M. & Tolhurst, D. J. J. Physiol, Lond. 229, 165–183 (1973).
Tolhurst, D. J. Vision Res. 12, 797–804 (1972).
Lawton, T. B. Vision Res. 24, 139–148 (1984).
Lawton, T. B. J. opt. Soc. Am. A2, 1140–1152 (1985).
Van Santen, J. P. H. & Sperling, G. J. opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 185–321 (1985).
Nakayama, K. & Silverman, G. H. J. opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 267–274 (1985).
Watson, A. B. & Ahumada, A. J. J. opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 322–342 (1985).
Morrone, M. C., Ross, J., Burr, D. C. & Owens, R. Nature 324, 250–253 (1986).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bennett, P., Banks, M. Sensitivity loss in odd-symmetric mechanisms and phase anomalies in peripheral vision. Nature 326, 873–876 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/326873a0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/326873a0
This article is cited by
-
Detection of narrow bars when presented in the right and left visual hemifields
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology (2005)
-
Detection of narrow bars when presented in the right and left visual hemifields
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology (2005)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
