Britain is falling behind the major industrialized countries in its investment in academic and related research, which may explain the nation's declining contribution to world science.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Irvine, J., Martin, B., Peacock, T. & Turner, R. Nature 316, 587–590 (1985).
Smith, D.C., Collins, P.M.D., Hicks, D.M. & Wyatt, S. Nature 323, 681–684 (1986).
Martin, B.R., Irvine, J. & Minchin, N., An International Comparison of Government Funding of Academic and Academically Related Research — Vol.1 (Main Report) and Vol.2 (Appendices), ABRC Science Policy Studies No.2 (Advisory Board for the Research Councils, London, 1986 — available only from SPRU).
OECD Science and Technology Indicators: Resources Devoted to R&D (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 1984).
Ward, M. Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures in the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 1985).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Irvine, J., Martin, B. Is Britain spending enough on science?. Nature 323, 591–594 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/323591a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/323591a0
This article is cited by
-
The normalization of co-authorship networks in the bibliometric evaluation: the government stimulation programs of China and Korea
Scientometrics (2016)
-
Comments on John Irvine and Ben R. Martin, recipients of the 1997 Derek de Solla price award
Scientometrics (1997)
-
The growth of British science
Nature (1991)
-
The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance a reply to Braun, Glänzel and Schubert
Scientometrics (1991)
-
The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance—Some comments on Martin's “reply”
Scientometrics (1991)