Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Empirical relation between sulphur dioxide emissions and acid deposition derived from monthly data

Abstract

The relation between sources of sulphur dioxide (SO2) and precipitation sulphate (SO4) concentrations at distant receptors is the subject of intensive empirical and theoretical investigation1,2. This relation provides a probe of atmospheric chemistry, physics and meteorology, and insight into the effectiveness of potential acid-deposition reduction strategies. Large variations in SO2 emissions from copper smelters in the southwestern United States, the major regional sulphur source, between 1980 and 1984 provide a unique opportunity to study the source–receptor relation, as during this interval the National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) monitored wet-precipitation sulphate concentrations on a weekly basis at Rocky Mountain locations. Here we extend our earlier analysis of annual-average data2 by examining monthly sulphate concentration and emission data for 1980–84. We show that monthly data are consistent with a linear relation between emissions and concentration, possessing the expected properties of a source–receptor relation. We then predict concentration changes resulting from the addition of a new smelter at Nacozari, Mexico, expected to be the second-largest source of SO2 in North America.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Work Group 2 US–Canada Memorandum of Intent on Transboundary Air Pollution (Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, 1982).

  2. Oppenheimer, M., Epstein, C. B. & Yuhnke, R. E. Science 229, 859–862 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. National Atmospheric Deposition Program Data Reports, Precipitation Chemistry (Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, 1980–84).

  4. Stenslund, G. J. et al. NADP Quality Insurance Report, Central Analytic Laboratory (Illinois State Water Survey, Urbana, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Junge, C. E. Air Chemistry and Radioactivity, Ch. 4 (Academic, New York, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cleveland, W. S., Devlin, S. J. & Terpenning, I. J. The SABL Seasonal and Calendar Adjustment Package (Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yuhnke, R. & Oppenheimer, M. Safeguarding Acid-Sensitive Waters in the Intermountain West (Environmental Defense Fund, Inc., New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Work Group 3B US-Canada Memorandum of Intent on Transboundary Air Pollution (Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, 1982).

  9. Pechan, E. H. & Wilson, J. H. Jr, J. Air Pollut. Control Ass. 34, 1075–1078 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Latimer, D. H. Modeling Regional Haze in the Southwest: A Preliminary Assessment of Source Contributions (Systems Applications, Inc., San Rafael, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oppenheimer, M. Atmos. Envir. 19, 1439–1443 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Knudson, D. A. An Inventory of Monthly Sulfur Dioxide Emissions for the Years 1975–1983 (Argonne National Laboratory Publ. No. ANL/EES-TM-277, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dupuis, L. R. & Lipfert, F. W. preprint, Brookhaven National Laboratory (1985).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Epstein, C., Oppenheimer, M. Empirical relation between sulphur dioxide emissions and acid deposition derived from monthly data. Nature 323, 245–247 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/323245a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/323245a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing