Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comet Halley
  • Published:

Comet Halley–solar wind interaction from electron measurements aboard Giotto

Abstract

Measurements made by the three-dimensional electron spectrometer of the RPA-Copernic experiment aboard the Giotto spacecraft give a preliminary description of the complex interaction between comet Halley and the solar wind. As Giotto approached the comet, it traversed several regions of differing plasma characteristics: a large (107 km) upstream region, a foreshock, a bow wave with its apex at 4×105 km, a transition region, a region permanently and strongly contaminated by cometary ions, a collisionopause at a sub-solar distance of 5−6×104 km, and various inner regions up to the inner coma, including a region of depleted hot plasma.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Rème, H. et al. Eur. Space Ag. spec. Publ. 1077, 33–52 (1986).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carlson, C. W., Curtis, D. W., Paschmann, G. & Michael, W. Adv. Space Res. 2, 67–70 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mendis, D. A. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 13, 239–242 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bame, S. J. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 13, 356–361 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rème, H., Sauvaud, J., d'Uston, C. et al. Comet Halley–solar wind interaction from electron measurements aboard Giotto. Nature 321 (Suppl 6067), 349–352 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/321349a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/321349a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing