Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Palaeobiological and sedimentological implications of fossil concentrations

Abstract

Concentrations of fossil hardparts are common features of the stratigraphical record and are preferred collecting sites for most palaeontological data. Nonetheless, most investigations into the nature of the fossil record have analysed the biasing effects of selective hardpart transport and destruction1,2 rather than the consequences of the concentration process itself. Genetic classification is discouraged by the diverse origins of skeletal accumulations, which range from predator gastric residues to shelly shoals and biostratigraphically condensed deposits; concentrations can thus form over time intervals of a few minutes to hundreds of thousands of years. I show here that the close association of shell beds with stratigraphical discontinuities in Miocene shallow marine deposits of Maryland3,4 provides the basis of a model of skeletal accumulation cast entirely in terms of changes in net sedimentation. This simple sedimentological model is a surprisingly powerful predictor of post-mortem bias and ecological composition of fossil assemblages, suggesting that fossil-rich and fossil-poor strata are qualitatively different, both as repositories of palaeontological information and as settings for biotic interactions. Moreover, the apparent primary importance of rates of sedimentation in skeletal accumulation—despite emphasis usually placed on rates of hardpart input—suggests a new approach to inferring the detailed dynamics of sediment deposition and erosion in the formation of stratigraphical sequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dodd, J. R. & Stanton, R. J. Jr Paleoecology, Concepts and Applications (Wiley, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brehrensmeyer, A. K. & Kidwell, S. M. Paleobiology 11, 105–119 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kidwell, S. M. 2nd N. Am. Paleont. Conv. Proc. 1, 295–300 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kidwell, S. M. Paleobiology (in the press).

  5. Barrell, J. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 28, 745–904 (1917).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell, C. V. Sedimentology 8, 7–26 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tipper, J. C. Nature 302, 696–698 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brinkmann, R. Abh. K. Ges. Wiss. Gottingen n.F. 13, 1–249 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kidwell, S.M. & Jablonski, D. in Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities (eds Tevesz, M. J. S. & McCall, P. L.) (Plenum, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kidwell, S. M. & Aigner, T. in Sedimentary and Evolutionary Cycles (eds Bayer, U. & Seilacher, A.) (Springer, Berlin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sylvester-Bradley, P. C. in Concepts and Methods of Biostratigraphy (eds Kauffman, E. G. & Hazel, J. E.) (Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Williamson, P. G. Nature 293, 437–443 (1981); 296, 611–612 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shattuck, G. B. in The Miocene Deposits of Maryland (eds Clark, W. B., Shattuck, G. B. & Dali, W. H.) (Maryland Geological Survey, 1904).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kelley, P. H. J. Paleont. 57, 581–598 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kidwell, S. M. Am. Ass. petrol. Geol. Mem. 36, 37–58 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kidwell, S. Palaeobiological and sedimentological implications of fossil concentrations. Nature 318, 457–460 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/318457a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/318457a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing