Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Photoadaptation of high Arctic ice algae

Abstract

In aquatic systems, the layer that is suitable for positive net photosynthesis (the euphotic zone) is usually considered to extend from the surface down to the depth of penetration of 1% of the surface irradiance, which corresponds to 15 µE m−2s−1 at solar noon during late summer in open waters in the high Arctic1. In polar regions, vernal blooms of epontic algae (unicellular algae associated with the lower interface of sea ice whose photosynthetic characteristics are not well known2–4) develop under conditions where they are only rarely or briefly exposed to light levels exceeding 1–2% of that incident at the surface. I report here that epontic algae from the Canadian Arctic show unusually high photosynthetic efficiencies normalized to pigment content, which increase with a decrease in the light levels at which the populations are growing. Photosynthesis was measurable at light intensities well below ambient (0.01% of surface irradiance). In the most shade-adapted populations5 under deeper snow cover, photosynthesis was optimal at light intensities close to the maximum ambient level, and inhibited at higher intensities. Furthermore, even after almost 2 months of exposure to elevated light levels (≈3–4% of surface irradiance), biomass and productivity normalized to biomass were still lowest in algae from an area almost free of snow cover. Taken together, these results indicate that epontic algae from the high Arctic can be considered as an obligate shade flora genetically constrained to very low photon fluxes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Platt, T., Harrison, W. G., Irwin, B., Horne, E. P. & Gallegos, C. L. Deep Sea Res. 29, 1159–1170 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Apollonio, S. Arctic 14, 197–200 (1961).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Apollonio, S. Arctic 18, 118–122 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bunt, J. S. Nature 199, 1255–1257 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Steemann Nielsen, E. & Jorgensen, E. G. Physiologia Pl. 21, 401–413 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alexander, V., Horner, R. & Clasby, R. C. Inst. mar. Sci. Rep. R74-4 (University of Alaska, 1974).

  7. Horner, R. & Schrader, G. C. Arctic 35, 485–503 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cross, W. Arctic 35, 13–27 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsiao, S. I. C. Arctic 33, 768–793 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis, M. R. & Smith, J. C. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 13, 99–102 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Holm-Hansen, O., Lorenzen, C. J., Holmes, R. W. & Strickland, J. D. H. J. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer 30, 3–15 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Platt, T., Gallegos, C. L. & Harrison, W. G. J. mar. Res. 38, 687–701 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gallegos, C. L. & Platt, T. Can. Bull. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 210, 103–112 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Talling, J. F. New Phytol. 56, 133–149 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gallegos, C. L., Platt, T., Harrison, W. G. & Irwin, B. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28, 698–708 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bunt, J. S. Antarct. Res. Ser. 1, 27–31 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bunt, J. S. & Lee, C. C. J. mar. Res. 28, 304–320 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Palmisano, A. C. & Sullivan, C. W. Polar Biol. 2, 171–177 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Palmisano, A. C., Soohoo, J. B. & Sullivan, C. W. J. Phycol. (in the press).

  20. Vedernikov, V. I. Oceanology 15, 482–485 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Richardson, K., Beardall, J. & Raven, J. A. New Phytol. 93, 157–191 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fogg, G. E. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 279, 27–38 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Palmisano, A. C., White, D. C., Smith, G. A., Stanton, G. R. & Burckle, L. H. J. Phycol. (in the press).

  24. Jacques, G. Polar Biol. 2, 27–33 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sullivan, C. W. et al. Antarct. J. U.S. 18, 177–179 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Radmer, R. J. & Kok, B. in Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Ser. Vol. 5 (eds Trebst, A. & Avron, M.) 125–135 (Springer, Berlin, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cota, G. Photoadaptation of high Arctic ice algae. Nature 315, 219–222 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/315219a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/315219a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing