Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evidence for echolocation in the oldest known bats

Abstract

The earliest-known bats are represented by excellent fossil material, including virtually complete skeletons of Icaronycteris index from the early Eocene (50 Myr BP) of western Wyoming1,2 and Palaeochiropteryx tupaiodon from the middle Eocene (45 Myr BP) ‘Grube Messel’ of western Germany3,4. These taxa have been closely allied1,5 with Recent Microchiroptera, a suborder of diverse bats noted for their powers of ultrasonic echolocation6. A problem with this relationship is the alleged absence in the Eocene forms of specializations in the auditory region7 and other aspects of the skeletal system1,2. It has been proposed, therefore, that the oldest bats are members of a group more primitive and possibly ancestral to the Microchiroptera and the visually oriented Megachiroptera8. Previously undescribed specimens now show, however, that Icaronycteris (Fig. 1) and Palaeochiropteryx (Fig. 2) share special basicranial features with microchiropterans which suggest comparable refinement of ultrasonic echolocation. These results support the theory that a sophisticated sonar system was present in the earliest records of microchiropteran history.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jepsen, G. L. Science 154, 1333–1339 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jepsen, G. L. in Biology of Bats Vol. 1 (ed. Wimsatt, W. A.) 1–64 (Academic, New York, 1970).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Revilliod, P. Abh. hess. geol. Landesanst. 7, 157–201 (1917).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richter, G. & Storch, G. Natur. Mus., Frankf. 110, 353–367 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, J. D. & Storch, G. Senckenberg. biol. 61, 153–167 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Koopman, K. F. in Orders and Families of Recent Mammals of the World (eds Anderson, S. & Jones, J. K.) 145–186 (Wiley, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Segal, W. Fieldiana, Zool. 58, 103–108 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Valen, L. Evol. Theory 4, 103–121 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stanek, V. J. Nakladen Ceske Akad Ved a Umeni, 1–67 (V. Praze, 1933).

  10. Henson, O. W. Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. 42, 151–255 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tepaske, E. R. thesis, Oklahoma State Univ. (1964).

  12. Fleischer, G. Säugetierk. Mitt. 21, 131–239 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fleischer, G. Evolutionary Principles of the Mammalian Middle Ear (Springer, Berlin, 1978).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Henson, O. W. in Biology of Bats Vol. 2 (ed. Wimsatt, W. A.), 181–261 (Academic, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Novacek, M. J. Proc. 5th int. Bat Res. Conf., 317–330 (Texas Technical Press, Lubbock, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sprague, J. M. Am. J. Anat. 72, 385–472 (1943).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Griffiths, T. A. Mammalia 47, 377–394 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pye, A. J. Morph. 119, 101–120 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruns, V. Verh. dt. zool. Ges. 141–154 (1979).

  20. Bruns, V., Fiedler, J. & Kraus, H. J. Myotis Vols 21–22 (1983–1984).

  21. van der Klaauw, C. J. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 62, 1–352 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Suthers, R. A. & Fattu, J. M. Am. Zool: 13, 1215–1226 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. von Bekesy, G. Experiments in Hearing (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dallos, P. The Auditory Periphery (Academic, New York, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Harris, D. M. & Dallos, P. Science 225, 741–743 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Novacek, M. J. Proc. 1st int. Congr. Vert. Morphol. (Fischer, Stuttgart, in the press.)

  27. Simmons, J. A., Howell, D. J. & Suga, N. Am. Sci. 63, 204–215 (1975).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fenton, M. B. Q. Rev. Biol. 59, 33–53 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Novacek, M. Evidence for echolocation in the oldest known bats. Nature 315, 140–141 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/315140a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/315140a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing