Abstract
Study design: Prospective controlled comparative analysis.
Objective: To determine whether a colostomy changes quality of life in patients with a spinal cord injury.
Method: A previously validated questionnaire designed to assess quality of life in spinal injured patients (Burwood Questionnaire) was sent to 26 spinal cord injured patients with colostomies and 26 spinal cord injured patients without colostomy. The two groups were matched for level of injury, completeness of injury, length of time since injury, age (±5 years) and gender.
Results: There was 100% completion of the questionnaire. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in the two groups of patients in regard to their general well being, emotional, social, or work functioning.
Conclusions: Patients with colostomy following spinal injury are no worse off in regard to quality of life, than those without. The inference is that perhaps a colostomy should be considered earlier in patients with major bowel dysfunction following spinal cord injury.
Sponsorship: Financial support for Dr AC Lynch was provided by Royal Australian College of Surgeons with a Foundation Scholarship and Grant in aid by the Burwood International Spinal Trust. Mr N Randell was supported by the Canterbury Medical Research Foundation with a summer studentship.
Spinal Cord (2001) 39, 279–282.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Frankel HL . Mortality, morbidity and psychosocial outcomes of persons SCI more than 20 years ago Paraplegia 1992 30: 617–630
Banwell JG, Creasey GH, Aggarwal AM, Mortimer JT . Management of the neurogenic bowel in patients with spinal cord injury Urol Clin North America 1993 20: 517–526
Clayton KS, Chubon RA . Factors associated with the quality of life of long term spinal cord injured persons Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994 75: 633–638
Stone JM, Wolfe VA, Nino-Murcia M, Perkash I . Colostomy as treatment for the complications of spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990 71: 514–518
Craven ML, Etchells J . A review of the outcome of stoma surgery on spinal cord injured patients J Adv Nur 1998 27: 922–926
Lynch AC, Anthony A, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA . Anorectal physiology following spinal cord injury Spinal Cord 2000 38: 573–580
Lynch AC et al. Bowel dysfunction following spinal cord injury: a description of bowel function in a spinal cord injured population and comparison with age and gender matched controls Spinal Cord 2000 38: 717–724
Glickman S, Kamm MA . Bowel dysfunction in spinal-cord-injury patients Lancet 1996 347: 1651–1653
Krause JS . Adjustment after spinal cord injury: a 9 year longitudinal study Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997 78: 651–657
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Randell, N., Lynch, A., Anthony, A. et al. Does a colostomy alter quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury? A controlled study. Spinal Cord 39, 279–282 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101156
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101156
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Impact of Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction on Bowel Symptoms
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports (2023)
-
Morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing fecal diversion as an adjunct to wound healing: a NSQIP comparison study
European Journal of Plastic Surgery (2019)
-
Ageing with neurogenic bowel dysfunction
Spinal Cord (2017)
-
Bowel Dysfunction in Spinal Cord Injury: Current Perspectives
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics (2014)
-
Neurogenic bowel management after spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the evidence
Spinal Cord (2010)