Abstract
Study design: Prospective study of intermittent self-catheterization (CIC) with change from conventional catheter to low-friction Urocath-Gel® catheter.
Objectives: To evaluate if such catheters are well accepted and to evaluate their practical use.
Methods: Thirty-nine male patients, between 19 and 74 years old, performing clean intermittent self-catheterization with conventional catheters for a neuropathic bladder for many years were included in this study after written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were clinical urinary tract infection, acute infection of urethra, prostate or epididymis, untreated urethral strictures and false passages or severe urethral bleeding occurring within the last month. During 1 month they changed to the use of the Urocath-Gel® catheter. Complications were noted. Satisfaction was evaluated by a visual analogue scale and by questioning.
Results: Four patients did not complete the study, two for side effects, two for difficulties with the catheterization technique. Time needed for CIC was not different with both techniques. Difficult introduction or difficult retreat of the catheter were not different in frequency. Impossibility to introduce the catheter was less frequent. Urethritis and urethral bleeding were less frequent than during the use of conventional catheters. Satisfaction was better with the low friction catheters. Negative satisfaction was mainly related to the availability and the use of water to lubricate the catheter, difficulty of manipulation and fear for cost.
Conclusion: The hydrophilic catheter Urocath-Gel® proved as easy to use as conventional catheters but was better tolerated. Satisfaction was better especially in patients who experienced problems with conventional catheters. Some patients were unsatisfied for reasons of practical use or for economical reasons.
Spinal Cord (2000) 38, 97–99.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wyndaele, J., De Ridder, D., Everaert, K. et al. Evaluation of the use of Urocath-Gel® catheters for intermittent self-catheterization by male patients using conventional catheters for a long time. Spinal Cord 38, 97–99 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100958
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100958
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
A scoping review on the impact of hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic intermittent catheters on UTI, QoL, satisfaction, preference, and other outcomes in neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients suffering from urinary retention
BMC Urology (2022)
-
Effects of hydrophilic coated catheters on urethral trauma, microtrauma and adverse events with intermittent catheterization in patients with bladder dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
International Urology and Nephrology (2022)
-
Prevalence of self-reported complications associated with intermittent catheterization in wheelchair athletes with spinal cord injury
Spinal Cord (2021)
-
Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses
BMC Urology (2017)
-
Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review
Spinal Cord (2017)