Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Lack of correlation between histone H4 acetylation and transcription during the Physarum cell cycle

Abstract

The interaction between nucleosomal proteins and DNA is expected to change during DNA replication as well as during transcription. A possible way of achieving the necessary structural changes is the modification of histones and high mobility group (HMG) proteins. The acetylation of core histones has been studied in various systems (for a review see ref. 1) and a correlation between histone acetylation and transcriptional activity of chromatin has frequently been proposed2–4. In particular, Bradbury and co-workers5,6 have reported a cell cycle dependence of histone H4 acetylation in Physarum polycephalum which revealed two correlations: (1) tetraacetylated H4 (H4Ac4) correlated with the rate of transcription and (2) H4 acetylation was inversely correlated with H1 phosphorylation in mitosis. We present evidence here that H4 acetylation does not fit these correlations. Our data clearly show that the acetate content of H4 is high during the S phase, but low during later stages of the cell cycle. H4Ac4 remains at a nearly constant level during the whole cycle, with an elevation during the S phase. Furthermore, experiments with the deacetylase inhibitor sodium-n-butyrate do not support the proposed5,6 connection between diacetylated H4 (H4Ac2) and DNA replication. Our data imply that a correlation of H4 acetylation and transcription is unlikely during the cell cycle of Physarum. The conclusions of Bradbury and co-workers are therefore invalid.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doenecke, D. & Gallwitz, D. Molec. cell. Biochem. 44, 113–128 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Davie, J. R. & Candido, P. M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 3574–3577 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Oberhauser, H., Csordas, A., Puschendorf, B. & Grunicke, H. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 84, 110–116 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dobson, M. E. & Ingram, V. M. Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 4201–4219 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chahal, S. S., Matthews, H. R. & Bradbury, E. M. Nature 287, 76–79 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matthews, H. R. & Bradbury, E. M. in Cell Biology of Physarum and Didymium (eds Aldrich, H. C. & Daniel, J. W.) 318–369 (Academic, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mittermayer, C., Braun, R. & Rusch, H. P. Biochim. biophys. Acta 91, 399–405 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Loidl, P., Gröbner, P., Csordas, A. & Puschendorf, B. J. cell. Sci. 58, 303–311 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cousens, L. S. & Alberts, B. M. J. biol. Chem. 257, 3945–3949 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Turnock, G. Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. molec. Biol. 23, 53–104 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gröbner, P. & Sachsenmaier, W. FEBS Lett. 71, 181–184 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gröbner, P. & Loidl, P. Biochim. biophys. Acta 697, 83–88 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kruh, J. Molec. cell. Biochem. 42, 65–82 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matthews, H. R. & Bradbury, E. M. in Genetic Expression in the Cell Cycle (eds Padilla, G. M. & McCarthy, K. S.) 31–54 (Academic, New York, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Davies, K. E. & Walker, I. O. FEBS Lett. 86, 303–306 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baer, B. W. & Rhodes, D. Nature 301, 482–488 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zweidler, A. Meth. Cell Biol. 17, 223–233 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Daniel, J. W. & Baldwin, H. H. in Methods in Cell Physiology Vol. 1 (ed. Prescott, D. M.) 9–41 (Academic, New York, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mohberg, J. & Rusch, H. P. Expl cell. Res. 66, 305–316 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohberg, J. & Rusch, H. P. Archs Biochem. Biophys. 134, 577–589 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Panyim, S. & Chalkley, R. Archs Biochem. Biophys. 130, 337–346 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loidl, P., Loidl, A., Puschendorf, B. et al. Lack of correlation between histone H4 acetylation and transcription during the Physarum cell cycle. Nature 305, 446–448 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/305446a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/305446a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing