Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Apparent reversion of stable in vitro genetic markers detected in tumour cells from spontaneous metastases

Abstract

The evolution towards more aggressive and autonomous behaviour of many cancerous tumours, often referred to as tumour progression1, is thought to stem from the development of heterogeneity within the tumour cell population, combined with the continuous selection of progressively more malignant cellular phenotypes2,3. During the course of the disease, the tumour cells show multiple phenotypic changes in a stepwise, but apparently random fashion, becoming more anaplastic, increasingly independent of growth controls and more metastatic4. Several laboratories, including our own, have analysed aspects of tumour heterogeneity and cancer metastasis by selecting and studying the properties of lectin-resistant (LecR) membrane mutant tumour sublines5–8; in a few cases, such variants have been claimed to be less tumorigenic5,6 or metastatic7,8 than the parental cells from which they were derived. We have attempted to study the factors involved in the reestablishment of tumour heterogeneity by monitoring the stability in vivo of LecR phenotypes of metastatic tumour cells after injection of cloned LecR tumour cells. We now report that spontaneous metastases arising after a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of cells from variant tumour lines selected from a highly metastatic DBA/2 mouse tumour known as MDAY-D29, and which were stably resistant in tissue culture to wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), no longer carry the WGA-resistant (WGAR) phenotype. The results demonstrate that WGAR tumour cells do not metastasize, but rather, ‘revertants’ for the WGAR phenotype, which presumably were generated in vivo after injection, were the cells actually capable of metastatic growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prehn, R. T. Adv. Cancer Res. 23, 203–236 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nowell, P. C. Science 14, 23–28 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Klein, G. & Klein, E. Transplant Proc. 9, 1095–1104 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Poste, G. & Fidler, I. J. Nature 283, 139–146 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kerbel, R. S. Am. J. Path. 97, 609–622 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tao, W.-W. & Burger, M. M. Nature 270, 437–438 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reading, C. L., Belloni, P. N. & Nicolson, G. J. J. natn. Cancer Inst. 64, 1241–1249 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dennis, J. W. & Kerbel, R. S. Cancer Res. 41, 98–104 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker, R. M. et al. Cell 1, 9–21 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schirrmacher, V. Immunobiology 157, 89–98 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kerbel, R. S., Florian, M., Man, M. S., Dennis, J. & McKenzie, I. F. C. J. natn. Cancer Inst. 64, 1221–1231 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vischer, P. & Reutter, W. Eur. J. Biochem. 84, 363–368 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiener, F., Fenyö, E. M. & Klein, G. Nature new Biol. 238, 155–159 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dennis, J., Donaghue, T., Florian, M. et al. Apparent reversion of stable in vitro genetic markers detected in tumour cells from spontaneous metastases. Nature 292, 242–245 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/292242a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/292242a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing