Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Rhythmic contractile activity of the in vivo rabbit aorta

Abstract

The cellular element of the aorta is largely smooth muscle; yet this organ has long been regarded as a passive elastic tube1–4, without regard for the possible function of its smooth muscle cells. The isolated rabbit aorta became popular as a convenient smooth muscle preparation5, and much has been learned about its cellular physiology, but unfortunately the functional role of this tissue was lost on its excision. Like many mammalian arterial preparations, the isolated aorta either fails to show spontaneous electrical or mechanical activity, or shows activity of a much slower frequency than the rhythmic activity of the heart6,7, thus obscuring any possible relationship with the pulsatile activity of the heart. However, contractions are elicited from the isolated aorta on stimulation with various neural and hormonal agents5–10. In effect, the aortic smooth muscle has been classified as multiunit, which suggests that physiological activation may be neurogenic11. Thus, removal of the muscle from the body may result in disruption of the neural connections which function in normal activation of contraction. We show here that when recordings of aortic tension are made in vivo, rhythmic contractions are observed. Evidence is presented which indicates that the contractions are neurogenic in origin and exhibit a precise phasing pattern with the pulse wave.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bazett, H. C. Am. J. Physiol. 70, 550–585 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maltby, A. B. & Wigers, C. J. Am. J. Physiol. 100, 604–613 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton, W. F. & Dow, P. Am. J. Physiol. 125, 48–59 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alexander, R. S. Fedn Proc. 11, 738–749 (1952).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Furchgott, R. F. & Bhadrakom, S. J. Pharmac. exp. Theor. 108, 129–143 (1953).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Biamino, G. & Kruckenberg, P. Am. J. Physiol. 217, 376–352 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Altura, B. M. & Altura, B. T. Microvascular Res. 7, 145–155 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Furchgott, R. F., Ehrreich, S. J. & Greenblatt, E. J. gen. Physiol. 44, 499–519 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van Breemen, C. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B265, 57–71 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Deth, R. & van Breemen, C. J. Membrane Biol. 40, 363–380 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fischer, E. Physiol. Rev. 24, 467–490 (1944).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dow, P. & Hamilton, W. F. Am. J. Physiol. 125, 60–65 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mountcastle, V. B. (ed.) Medical Physiology. Vol. 1, 13th edn (Mosby, St Louis, 1974).

  14. Ganong, W. F. Review of Medical Physiology. 2nd edn (Lange Medical, Los Altos, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tomita, T. Prog. Biophys. molec. Biol. 30, 185–202 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Connor, J. A., Mangel, A. M. & Nelson, B. Am. J. Physiol. 237, C237–C246 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boucek, R. J., Takashita, R. & Fojaco, R. Am. J. Anat. 114, 273–282 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Prokop, E. K., Palmer, R. F. & Wheat, M. W. Circulation Res. 27, 121–127 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mangel, A., Fahim, M. & van Breemen, C. Rhythmic contractile activity of the in vivo rabbit aorta. Nature 289, 692–694 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/289692a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/289692a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing