Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The ecological significance of solar UV radiation on aquatic organisms

Abstract

Stratospheric ozone shields the Earth from much of the solar UV – B radiation which is the most biologically injurious component of sunlight. It is possible that both human technologies and natural events, such as reversal of the Earth's magnetic polarity, might lead to significant ozone reductions. The methodology of evaluation of the impact of an agent such as solar UV on organisms or ecosystems has not been firmly established and there has been little research in this area in the past. A new approach is proposed here. If solar UV were an important injurious factor in nature, then living organisms would be required to expend energy to cope with the solar UV exposure they receive. If organisms must specifically mitigate solar UV injury, then it would be expected that only a minimal tolerance would be achieved. We have quantitatively estimated exposure and tolerance of a number of aquatic organisms and find them to be remarkably similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Calkins, J., Buckles, J. D. & Moeller, J. R. Photochem. Photobiol. 24, 49–57 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Calkins, J. Proc. 3rd A. Conf. Climatic Impact Assessment Program, 505–517 (US Department of Transportation, DOT-TSC-OST-74-15, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, 1974); and in Climatic Impact Assessment Program Monogr. V, 33–71 (US Department of Transportation DOT-TST 75–55, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robertson, D. F. in The Biologic Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation (ed. Urbach, F.) 433–436 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1969); thesis, Univ. Queensland (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berger, D., Robertson, D. F. & Davis, R. E. in Climatic Impact Assessment Program V, 233–264 (US Department of Transportation DOT-TST 75-55, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morowitz, H. J. Science 111, 229–230 (1950).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harm, W. Radiat. Res. 40, 63–69 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barcelo, J. A. & Calkins, J. Photochem. Photobiol. 29, 75–83 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Calkins, J. Photochem. Photobiol. 8, 115–129 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Calkins, J., Thordardottir, T. The ecological significance of solar UV radiation on aquatic organisms. Nature 283, 563–566 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/283563a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/283563a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing