Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Macrophage requirements for mouse B-cell stimulation differ according to the molecular form of anti-IgM antibodies

Abstract

THYMUS-INDEPENDENT lymphocytes (B cells) comprise a heterogeneous population. Because of this heterogeneity, the precise nature of the signals which activate resting B cells to become antibody-forming cells is not known. It is likely that different subsets of B cells have different signalling requirements1–3. In addition, it has been proposed that B-cell proliferation and differentiation are controlled by separate and distinct signals4. Proliferation is thought to result from antigen binding with specific cell-surface immunoglobulin (Ig) receptors. However, due to the very low frequency of B cells reactive to a specific antigen, the activation process per se is difficult to study. This problem may be overcome by using reagents which mimic specific antigen binding to Ig receptors but act as polyclonal B-cell activators (PBAs). Anti-Ig antibodies are thought to function in this way and have been shown to be mitogenic for B cells5–7. Our laboratory has previously shown that soluble rabbit anti-mouse IgM or F(ab′)2 anti-IgM is mitogenic for mouse splenic B cells8,9. The response to intact anti-IgM only occurs with B cells from mice which are 7 months or older. In contrast, F(ab′)2 anti-IgM will stimulate B cells from both young and aged mice equally well suggesting that changes in B-cell Fc receptors may be involved in the age-dependent response to the intact anti-IgM molecule10. In all cases, the response requires cross-linkage of surface μ heavy chains and is T-cell independent10,11. In the present study, we have investigated the macrophage requirement for anti-Ig stimulation. The requirement for macrophages in B-cell activation by PBAs, including anti-Ig reagents, is controversial12,13. We report that the proliferative response of B cells to intact anti-IgM is macrophage dependent whereas the response of the same cell population to F(ab′)2 anti-IgM is macrophage independent.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lemke, H. et al. Scand. J. Immun. 4, 707–720 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis, G. K., Ranken, R., Nitecki, D. E. & Goodman, J. M. J. Exp. Med. 144, 382–397 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Persson, U. C. I., Hammarström, L. L. G. & Smith, C. I. J. Immun. 119, 1138–1144 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dutton, R. W. Transplant Rev. 23, 66–77 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sell, S. & Gell, P. G. H. J. exp. Med. 122, 423–440 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Skamene, E. & Ivanyi, J. Nature 221, 681–682 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gausset, P. et al. J. Immun. 116, 446–453 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weiner, H. L., Moorhead, J. W. & Claman, H. N. J. Immun. 116, 1656–1661 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiner, H. L., Scribner, D. J. & Moorhead, J. W. J. Immun. 120, 1907–1912 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Scribner, D. J., Weiner, H. L. & Moorhead, J. W. J. Immun. 121, 377–382 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weiner, H. L., Moorhead, J. W., Yamaga, K. & Kubo, R. T. J. Immun. 117, 1527–1531 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Persson, U. et al. Immun. Rev. 40, 78–101 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Diener, E. & Lee, K. C. in Progress in Immunology III (eds Mandel, T. E. et al.) 413–421 (Australian Academy of Science, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sieckmann, D. G. et al. J. exp. Med. 148, 1628–1643 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mongini, P., Friedman, S. & Wortis, H. Nature 276, 709–711 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ly, I. A. & Mishell, R. J. immun. Meth. 5, 239–247 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, C. & Hirsch, J. G. J. exp. Med. 136, 604–717 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sidman, C. L. & Unanue, E. R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 2401–2405 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Parker, D. C. Nature 258, 361–363 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schrier, R. D., Hattori, M. & Moorhead, J. W. J. Immun. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HATTORI, M., SCRIBNER, D. & MOORHEAD, J. Macrophage requirements for mouse B-cell stimulation differ according to the molecular form of anti-IgM antibodies. Nature 280, 316–318 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/280316a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/280316a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing