Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Increased sensitivity to (+)amphetamine self-administered by rats following meso-cortico-limbic dopamine neurone destruction

Abstract

DRUG self-administration (SA) in laboratory animals shows some of the characteristics of intracranial self-stimulation and of other natural reinforcers (for review see ref. 1). Animals will self-administer many of the same drugs abused by human subjects. Recent evidence has shown that (+)amphetamine reinforces behaviour in the same manner as conventional reinforcers1–3 that it acts mainly on dopamine (DA) transmission, and that locomotor activation and stereotypy are mediated by the mesolimbic–mesocortical (A10 group) and nigro-striatal (A9 group) DA systems, respectively4,5. Using various specific noradrenergic and dopaminergic blocking agents in a (+)amphetamine SA retention paradigm, DA transmission blockade was shown to produce effects similar to reward reduction and reward termination3,6,7. DA transmission in the frontal-mesolimbic system has been implicated in brain stimulation reward8, and the link between self-administration of (+)amphetamine and reward mechanisms, both of which depend on DA transmission, may be related to the craving and early dependence that certain subjects display for addictive drugs. However, the mechanisms which lead to addiction are still unclear, and it is possible that in drug addicts the particularly strong and rapid addicting effect of the drug could be due to a pre-existing imbalance in some homeostatic mechanism. Thus, the use of healthy animals in a steady-state paradigm is not necessarily a good model for the study of the psychological or neurobiological vulnerability to drug addiction acquisition. Because the meso-cortico-limbic DA system may be an essential target for psychostimulant drugs, the lesion of this system could induce disruption of SA behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spealman, R. D. & Goldberg, S. R. A. Rev. Pharmac. Tox. 18, 313–339 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pickens, R. & Harris, W. C. Psychopharmacologia 12, 158–163 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yokel, R. A. & Wise, R. A. Science 187, 547–549 (1975).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly, P. H., Seviour, P. W. & Iversen, S. D. Brain Res. 94, 507–522 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Iversen, S. D. & Koob, G. F. Adv. Biochem. Psychopharmac. 16, 209–214 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yokel, R. A. & Wise, R. A. Psychopharmacology 48, 311–318 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Risner, M. E. & Jones, B. E. Pharmac. Biochem. Behav. 5, 477–481 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Myers, R. D. & Mora, F. Brain Res. Bull. 2, 105–112 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Le Moal, M., Stinus, L. & Galey, D. Expl Neurol. 50, 521–535 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yokel, R. A. & Pickens, R. Psychopharmacologia 34, 255–264 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Glick, S. D. & Marsanico, R. G. J. comp. Physiol. Psychol. 88, 355–359 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lyon, M. & Robbins, T. in Current Developments in Psychopharmacology Vol. 2 (eds Essman, W. & Valzelli, L.) (Spectrum, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koob, G. F., Riley, S. J., Smith, C. & Robbins, T. J. comp. Physiol. Psychol. 92, 917–927 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts, D. C. G., Corcoran, M. E. & Fibiger, H. C. Pharmac. Biochem. Behav. 6, 615–620 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Moal, M., Cardo, B. & Stinus, L. Physiol. Behav. 4, 567–574 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Galey, D., Simon, H. & Le Moal, M. Brain Res. 124, 83–97 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stinus, L., Gaffori, O., Simon, H. & Le Moal, M. J. comp. Physiol. Psychol. 92, 289–296 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tassin, J. P. et al. Brain Res. 141, 267–281 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stinus, L., Gaffori, O., Simon, H. & Le Moal, M. Biol. Psychiat. 12, 719–731 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Simon, H. et al. Behav. neural Biol. (in the press).

  21. Philips, A. G. & Fibiger, H. C. Can. J. Psychol. 32, 58–66 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MOAL, M., STINUS, L. & SIMON, H. Increased sensitivity to (+)amphetamine self-administered by rats following meso-cortico-limbic dopamine neurone destruction. Nature 280, 156–158 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/280156a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/280156a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing