Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Hepatic glucocorticoid receptors and the H–2 locus

Abstract

VARIOUS inbred strains of mice exhibit different degrees of susceptibility to both spontaneous and glucocorticoid-induced cleft palate1,2, and specific genetic and biochemical factors that may be responsible for these differences have been identified. At the genetic level, variations at the H–2 locus have been associated with susceptibility to glucocorticoid-induced cleft palate3,4, while at the biochemical level, evidence suggests that numbers and characteristics of glucocorticoid receptors in murine embryonic facial mesenchyme cells differ in the various strains. Specifically, Salomon and Pratt showed that facial mesenchyme cells cultured from fetuses of the A/J strain (which is highly susceptible to glucocorticoid-induced cleft palate) contain twice as many glucocorticoid receptors as do such cells from C57BL/6J, a low susceptibility strain5. They also reported that the glucocorticoid receptor of the A/J strain has a lower affinity for dexamethasone (KD = 1.7 × 10−8 M) than does that of the C57BL/6J strain (KD = 7.9 × 10−9M) (ref. 5). In an attempt to relate steroid receptor activity to H–2 haplotype, Goldman et al. used 3H-cortisol and isoelectric focusing to study glucocorticoid receptors in facial mesenchyme cells of these and several other strains6. They concluded that “a product of a gene in or near the H–2 locus seems to be the glucocorticoid receptor, the level of which must be increased for a congenital malformation to occur”. Such conclusions must be questioned, however, because the experimental procedure required microelectrofocusing of isolated protein–cortisol complex for 40 h. Receptor binding is reversible, and in the absence of free steroid, the half life of the receptor–cortisol complex is only about 1 h at 0 °C (ref. 7). It is unlikely that a peak of radioactivity detected by isoelectric focusing after 40 h represents binding to a specific receptor. Thus an association between H–2 haplotype and glucocorticoid receptor activity has not been established definitively. However, the possibility that H–2 might determine hormone receptor levels or characteristics is exciting. We have explored the relationship between H–2 and glucocorticoid receptors by examining the level of specific glucocorticoid-binding activity in liver cytosols prepared from different mouse strains.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baxter, H. & Fraser, F. C. McGill Med. J. 19, 245–249 (1950).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shah, R. M. & Travill, A. A. Teratology 13, 71–84 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonner, J. J. & Slavkin, H. C. Immunogenetics 2, 213–218 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biddle, F. G. & Fraser, F. C. Genetics 85, 289–302 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Salomon, D. S. & Pratt, R. M. Nature 264, 174–177 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldman, A. S., Katsumata, M., Yaffe, S. J. & Gasser, D. L. Nature 265, 643–645 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pratt, W. B., Kaine, J. L. & Pratt, D. V. J. biol. Chem. 250, 4584–4591 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Granberg, J. P. & Ballard, P. L. Endocrinology 100, 1160–1168 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nielsen, C. J., Vogel, W. M. & Pratt, W. B. Cancer Res. 37, 3420–3426 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Edidin, M. in Transplantation Antigens (eds Kahan, B. D. & Reisfeld, R. A.) 128 (Academic, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bell, P. A. & Munck, A. Biochem. J. 136, 97–107 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nielsen, C. J., Sando, J. J. & Pratt, W. B. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 1398–1402 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nielsen, C. J., Sando, J. J., Vogel, W. M. & Pratt, W. B. J. biol. Chem. 252, 7568–7578 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sando, J. J., Nielsen, C. J. & Pratt, W. B. J. biol. Chem. 252, 7579–7582 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BUTLEY, M., ERICKSON, R. & PRATT, W. Hepatic glucocorticoid receptors and the H–2 locus. Nature 275, 136–138 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/275136a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/275136a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing