Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Limit of single vision in stereopsis depends on contour sharpness

Abstract

OUR two eyes see slightly different images of the world, and this enables us to estimate the position of objects in depth. When we look at a fixed point in space we can correctly judge the distance of an object that is in front of, or behind this point by the amount of disparity of its retinal images. Our brain combines these disparate images in such a way that we can see the object as single within a certain limit of disparity. This limit is called Panum's fusional area; for fine-line targets the disparity limits are found to be ±7 min arc for central (foveal) vision, and larger for peripheral vision (for review see ref. 1). However, Fender and Julesz2 demonstrated that fusion may be extended beyond Panum's area when random-dot stereograms are used. Experiments reported here demonstrate that Panum's area also increases for stimuli with blurred contours, that is, for contours containing lower spatial frequencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bishop, P. O. in Adler's Physiology of the Eye, Ch. 21 (C. V. Mosby, St Louis, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fender, D. & Julesz, B. J. opt. Soc. Am. 57, 819–830 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blakemore, C. & Hague, B. J. Physiol., Lond. 225, 437–455 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tolhurst, D. J. Vision Res. 12, 797–804 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shapley, R. M. & Tolhurst, D. J. J. Physiol., Lond. 229, 169–183 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kulikowski, J. & King-Smith, P. E. Vision Res. 13, 1455–1478 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. King-Smith, P. E. & Kulikowski, J. J. Physiol., Lond. 236, 5P–6P (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell, F. W. & Robson, J. G. J. Physiol., Lond. 197, 551–566 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson, J. O. The Psychology of Visual Illusion. (Hutchinson, London, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barlow, H. B., Blakemore, C. & Pettigrew, J. D. J. Physiol., Lond. 193, 327–34 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nikara, T., Bishop, P. O. & Pettigrew, J. D. Expl Brain Res. 6, 343–372 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Joshua, D. E. & Bishop, P. E. Expl. Brain Res. 10, 389–416 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Graham, N., Robson, J. G. & Nachmias, J. Vision Res. 18, 815–825 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maffei, L. & Fiorentini, A. Vision Res. 17, 257–264 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KULIKOWSKI, J. Limit of single vision in stereopsis depends on contour sharpness. Nature 275, 126–127 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/275126a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/275126a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing