Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Loss of phototaxis in silkworm larvae after smelling mulberry leaves and recovery after electroconvulsive shock

Abstract

NEWLY hatched larvae of the silkworm Bombyx mori show a strong phototactic response to ultraviolet (357 nm), green (557 nm) and yellow (585 nm) light, but this is lost rapidly after they are fed on fresh mulberry leaves1, as reported for some lepidopterous caterpillars2,3. After being fed on an artificial diet containing neither mulberry leaves nor their extract, silkworm larvae continue to be phototactic (our unpublished data). Thus loss of the phototactic response is not caused by the stimulus of feeding, for example through a signal from the pharynx or abdomen. A chemical stimulus from mulberry leaves seems to affect the response directly. Chemicals of plant origin, which are perceived through the sense organs, have been found to elicit or repress some insect behavioural responses4, but little is known of the effect of the odour of food plants on the phototactic response of insects. We report here that silkworm larvae temporarily lose their normal phototactic response after smelling mulberry leaves and that a moderate electroconvulsive shock restores the response.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shimizu, I., Kitabatake, S. & Kato, M. Proc. Jap. Acad. 52, 137–140 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brandt, H. Z. vergl. Physiol. 24, 188–197 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wigglethworth, V. B. in The Principles of Insect Physiology 317–318 (Chapman and Hall, London, 1972).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Dethier, V. G. in Control of Insect Behavior by Natural Products (ed. Wood, D. L., Silverstein, R. M. & Nakajima, M.) 21–28 (Academic, London, 1970).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Morita, H. & Yamashita, S. J. exp. Biol. 38, 851–861 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dethier, V. G. Biol. Bull. 80, 403–414 (1941).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Watanabe, T. Nature 182, 325–326 (1958).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamamura, Y. & Naito, K. Nature 190, 879–880 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayashiya, K., Yajima, M. & Hirose, S. J. sericult. Sci. Japan 45, 358–364 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamamura, Y. Nature 183, 1746–1747 (1959).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McGaugh, J. L. Science 153, 1351–1358 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Menzel, R., Erber, J. T. & Masuhr, T. in Experimental Analysis of Insect Behavior (ed. Barton Browne, L.) 195–217 (Springer, Berlin, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SHIMIZU, I., KATO, M. Loss of phototaxis in silkworm larvae after smelling mulberry leaves and recovery after electroconvulsive shock. Nature 272, 248–249 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/272248a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/272248a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing