Abstract
PHYTOCHROME is a chromoprotein that has been shown to initiate and control major developmental responses of plants to light1. It has two spectrally different forms that can be reversibly interconverted by light, as indicated:The spectral properties of phytochrome are sensitive to changes in the microenvironment of the covalently bound chromophore(s). Relatively mild denaturing treatments, such as incubation at 25 °C for over an hour2 and dehydration3, result in a significant loss of photoreversibility. In view of this susceptibility to spectral denaturation, it is remarkable that phytochrome can be proteolytically degraded to a molecular weight (MW) of 60,000, or half its native subunit size, without exhibiting any loss of photoreversibility or even any blue shift in its peak absorbance as Pr4. The additional fact that further proteolysis of phytochrome to 40,000 MW drastically reduces photoreversibility5 suggests that the 60,000 MW fragment has a sequence and configuration that are both sufficient and necessary to preserve photoreversibility. It is not clear whether this fragment is the product of one or more centrally located cleavages of the native subunit to yield two pieces of MW near 60,000 per native subunit or whether it is the product of extensive proteolysis which yields a single 60,000 MW fragment per native subunit. We have compared the amino acid composition and the peptide map of the proteolytically-derived 60,000 MW fragment with those of the native 120,000 MW subunit. Our results strongly support the conclusion that the native 120,000 MW subunit is composed of two halves with nearly identical sequences.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hendricks, S. B. & Borthwick, H. A. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 58, 2125–2130 (1967).
Butler, W. L., Siegleman, H. W. & Miller, C. O. Biochemistry 3, 851–857 (1964).
Tobin, E. M., Briggs, W. R. & Brown, P. K. Photochem. Photobiol. 18, 497–503 (1973).
Gardner, G., Pike, C. S., Rice, H. V. & Briggs, W. R. Pl. Physiol. 48, 686–693 (1971).
Stoker, B. M., McEntire, K. & Roux, S. J. Photochem. Photobiol. (in the press).
Stephens, R. E. Analyt. Biochem. 65, 369–379 (1975).
Roux, S. J., Lisansky, S. G. & Stoker, B. M. Physiologia Pl. 35, 85–90 (1975).
Roux, S. J. thesis, Yale Univ. (1971).
Stein, S., Chang, C. H., Böhlen, P., Imai, K. & Udenfriend, S. Analyt. Biochem. 60, 272–277 (1974).
Pike, C. S. & Briggs, W. R. Pl. Physiol. 49, 521–530 (1973).
Rice, H. V. & Briggs, W. R. Pl. Physiol. 51, 927–938 (1973).
Cundiff, S. C. & Pratt, L. H. Pl. Physiol. 55, 212–217 (1975).
Georgevich, G., Cedel, T. E. & Roux, S. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 4439–4443 (1977).
Roux, S. J. & Yguerabide, J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70, 762–764 (1973).
Spencer, R. L. & Wold, F. Analyt. Biochem 32, 185–190 (1969).
Stephens, R. E. Biochemistry 16, 2047–2058 (1977).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
STOKER, B., ROUX, S. & BROWN, W. Evidence for symmetry in the phytochrome subunit. Nature 271, 180–182 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/271180a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/271180a0
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.