Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Red cell charge is not a function of cell age

Abstract

REPORTS1,2 that the oldest circulating human erythrocytes have an electrophoretic mobility up to 30% lower than the youngest cells have been widely accepted, particularly since such findings suggest a plausible mechanism for the removal of the oldest cells from circulation. For those studies1,2 the red cells were separated on the basis of age by using the accepted relationship that older cells are denser on the average than younger cells. We report here that electrophoretic mobility studies conducted independently by conventional electrophoresis, streak width measurements and electrophoretic light scattering have shown the mobilities to be the same for red cell fractions of differing density and hence age in vivo. These data suggest that hypotheses which invoke a role for decreasing surface charge density in the mechanism of senescent red cell recognition in vivo are unsound.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Danon, D. & Marikovsky, Y. C. r. hebd. Acad. Sci., Paris 253, 1271–1272 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yaari, A. Blood 33, 159–163 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Danon, D., Marikovsky, Y. & Skutelsky, E. Red Cell Structure and Metabolism (ed. Ramot, B.) 23–28 (Academic, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kay, M. M. B. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 3521–3525 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashwell, G. & Morell, A. G. Adv. Enzym. 41, 99–128 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lloyd, C. W. Biol. Rev. 50, 325–350 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bocci, V. Experientia 32, 135–140 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chien, S. et al. Blood 43, 445–460 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luner, S. J., Sturgeon, P., Szklarek, D. & McQuiston, D. T. Vox Sang. 29, 440–449 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Myllylä, G. et al. Vox Sang. 20, 7–23 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenwalt, T. J. & Steane, E. A. Br. J. Haematol. 25, 207–215 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baxter, A. & Beeley, J. G. Biochem. J. 3, 134–136 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen, N. S., Ekholm, J. E., Luthra, M. G. & Hanahan, D. J. Biochim. biophys. Acta 419, 229–242 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cook, G. M. W., Heard, D. H. & Seaman, G. V. F. Nature 191, 44–47 (1961)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Luner, S. J. & Szklarek, D. Biophys. J. 16, 168a (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sturgeon, P., Kolin, A., Kwak, K. S. & Luner, S. J. Hematologia 6, 93–108 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sass, M. D., Vorsanger, E. & Spear, P. W. Clin. chim. Acta 10, 21–26 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Danon, D. & Marikovsky, Y. J. Lab. clin. Med. 64, 668–674 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ware, B. R. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 4, 1–44 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Murphy, J. R. J. Lab. clin. Med. 82, 334–341 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aminoff, D. Biochem. J. 81, 384–392 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Henry, R. J., Chiamori, N., Golub, O. J. & Berkman, S. Am. J. clin. Path. 34, 381–398 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Seaman, G. V. F. The Red Blood Cell 2 (ed. Surgenor, D. M.), 1135–1229 (Academic, New York, 1975).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Bangham, A. D., Flemans, R., Heard, D. H. & Seaman, G. V. F. Nature 182, 642–644 (1958).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LUNER, S., SZKLAREK, D., KNOX, R. et al. Red cell charge is not a function of cell age. Nature 269, 719–721 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/269719a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/269719a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing