Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Are monkeys logical?

Abstract

THE monkey's status as a thinker has never been high; yet laboratory investigations testify, nevertheless, to the ability of many species of monkey to learn complex tasks, if not to reason. On this latter point, however, hard evidence is significantly lacking. One reason for this is that it is difficult to devise tests which are both meaningful to non-verbal subjects yet satisfy the stringent requirements of a formal reasoning test such as one adapted from Burt1 which first gives the subject the following information: “Edith is fairer than Suzanne”, “Edith is darker than Lili”, and then requires solution of the question, “which is the darkest, Edith, Suzanne or Lili?”. Bryant and Trabasso2 have devised a simplified method of giving such tests to very young children, and we have adapted this into a non-verbal one for use with monkeys.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burt, C. J. exp. Pedagogy 5, 68–77 (1919).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bryant, P. E. & Trabasso, T. Nature 232, 456–458 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McGonigle, B. O. J. comp. Physiol. Psychol. 64, 110–113 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Navarick, D. J. & Fantino, E. Psychol Rev. 81, 426–441 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McGonigle, B. O. & Jones, B. T. Perception 6, 213–217 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Trabasso, T. in Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology 9 (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Boysson-Bardies, B. & O'Regan, K. Nature 246, 531–534 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MCGONIGLE, B., CHALMERS, M. Are monkeys logical?. Nature 267, 694–696 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/267694a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/267694a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing