Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Importance–value curves and diversity indices applied to a species-rich heathland in Western Australia

Abstract

RANKING of species in a community from most to least important (abundant) to yield an ‘importance-value’ (IV) curve is a device often used by ecologists to elucidate features of that community. Increasingly in the literature1–5, an IV curve which obeys the lognormal function is being accepted as describing the ultimate in plant species diversity. South-western Australia is renowned for its apparent floristic richness and high degree of endemism. An ecological study of sand heath, considered by botanists the major repository of this supposed ‘incredible richness’6,7, has revealed a type of IV curve not previously noted for vegetation. The values for six of seven indices of species diversity examined were as high as, if not higher than, those for the most diverse communities previously recorded, including the richest of tropical rainforests2,4,8–10. All earlier indices of equitability (evenness of species' importance) are based on models of limited applicability and a new index, based on the actual slope of the IV curve, is proposed here.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shimwell, D. W., The Description and Classification of Vegetation (Sidgwick and Jackson, London, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bazzaz, F. A., Ecology, 56, 485–488 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. May, R. M., Nature, 258, 285–286 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Whittaker, R. H., and Niering, W. A., Ecology, 56, 771–790 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Whittaker, R. H., Taxon, 21, 213–251 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Whittaker, R. H., Communities and Ecosystems, 2nd edn (Macmillan, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gardner, C. A., J. R. Soc. W. Aust., 28, 11–87 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marchant, N. G., J. R. Soc. W. Aust., 56, 23–30 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Foore, M. E. D., J. Ecol., 52, Suppl., 213–226 (1964); ibid., 56, 143–196 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Knight, D. H., Ecol. Monogr., 45, 259–284 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Westman, W. E., Aust. J. Bot., 23, 339–354 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Specht, R. L., Roe, E. M., and Boughton, V. H., Aust. J. Bot., Suppl. 7 (1974).

  13. Raunkiaer, C. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Trepp, W., Schweitz-Landw., 28, 366–371 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Curtis, J. T., and McIntosh, R. P., Ecology, 31, 434–455 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cain, S. A., and de Oliveira Castro, G. M., Manual of Vegetation Analysis, 211 (Harper, New York, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kershaw, K. A., Quantitative and Dynamic Plant Ecology, 2nd edn 198–9 (Arnold, London, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Motomura, I., Jap. J. Zool., 44, 279–283 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Preston, F. W., Ecology, 29, 254–283 (1948).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pielou, E. C., An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology, (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1969).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. MacArthur, R. H., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 43, 293–295 (1957).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fisher, R. A., Corbett, A. S., and Williams, C. B., J. anim. Ecol., 12, 42–58 (1943).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gleason, H. A., Ecology, 3, 158–162 (1922).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Simpson, E. H., Nature, 163, 688 (1949).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W., The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1963).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Sale, P. F., and Dybdahl, R., Ecology, 56, 1343–1355 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Thatcher, A. C., and Westman, W. E., Proc. ecol. Soc. Aust., 9, 17–33 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Clark, S. S., Proc. ecol. Soc. Aust., 9, 1–16 (1975).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Speck, N. H., thesis, Univ. Western Australia (1958).

  30. Stebbins, G. L., Flowering Plants—Evolution above the Species Level, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1974).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LAMONT, B., DOWNES, S. & Fox, J. Importance–value curves and diversity indices applied to a species-rich heathland in Western Australia. Nature 265, 438–441 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/265438a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/265438a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing