Abstract
XERODERMA pigmentosum (XP) is a human disease characterised by sensitivity to sunlight1, a high incidence of skin cancer1 and a deficiency in DNA repair2. Investigations of DNA damage and repair in XP cells exposed to chemical carcinogens3–8 had led to the classification of these agents in two groups: those in which damage can be repaired by apparently normal levels of excision repair (for example, monofunctional alkylating agents) and those in which it cannot (for example, 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide) (Table 1). In XP cells, normal excision of MMS9 or MNNG10 damage is correlated with normal levels of chromosome aberrations, and reduced excision repair of 4NQO damage is correlated with high levels of chromosome aberrations9, indicating that unrepaired damage is correlated with high levels of aberrations. It has recently been found that although sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) differ from aberrations in many ways, they are far more sensitive indicators of chromosomal damage11. We therefore considered that a comparison of excision repairability with the yields of SCEs induced by chemicals might be informative in elucidating mechanisms of SCE formation. The results indicate that, contrary to the results with aberrations, the frequency of induced SCEs is higher in XP cells than in normal cells whether or not XP cells can perform normal amounts of excision repair of the chemically-induced damage. The data indicate that the lesions and/or subsequent events that give rise to chromosome aberrations are different from those leading to sister chromatid exchange and that SCE formation in XP cells is the most sensitive mammalian system yet described for detecting possible genetic effects of chemicals.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Robbins, J. H., Kraemer, K. H., Lutzner, M. A., Festoff, B. W., and Coon, H. G., Ann. Int. Med., 80, 221–248 (1974).
Cleaver, J. E., and Bootsma, D., Adv. Genet., 9, 19–38 (1975).
Cleaver, J. E., Mutat. Res., 12, 453–462 (1971).
Stich, H. F., and San, R. H. C., Mutat. Res., 13, 279–282 (1971).
Stich, H. F., San, R. H. C., Miller, J. A., and Miller, E. C., Nature new Biol., 238, 9–10 (1972)
Stich, H. F., San, R. H. C., and Kawazoe, Y., Mutat. Res., 17, 127–137 (1973).
Cleaver, J. E., Cancer Res., 33, 362–369 (1973).
Regan, J. D., and Setlow, R. B., Cancer Res., 34, 3318–3325 (1974).
Sasaki, M. S., Mutat. Res., 20, 291–293 (1973).
Stich, H. F., Stich, W., and San, R. H. C., Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med., 142, 1141–1144 (1973).
Perry, P., and Evans, H. J. Nature, 258, 121–125 (1975).
Wolff, S., and Perry, P., Expl Cell Res., 93, 23–30 (1975).
Latt, S. A., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 3162–3166 (1974).
Chaganti, R. S. K., Schonberg, S., and German, J., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 4508–4512 (1974).
Wolff, S., Bodycote, J., Thomas, G. H., and Cleaver, J. E., Genetics, 81, 349–355 (1975).
Galloway, S. M., and Evans, H. J., Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 15, 17–29 (1975).
Wolff, S., and Perry, P., Chromosoma, 48, 341–353 (1974).
Bartram, C. R., Koske-Westphal, T., and Passarge, E. Ann. Hum. Genet., London, 40, 79–86 (1976).
Cleaver, J. E., Intl J. Rad. Biol., 18, 557–565 (1970).
Sasaki, M. S., Nature, 257, 501–503 (1975).
Wolff, S., Bodycote, J., and Painter, R. B., Mutat. Res., 25, 73–81 (1974).
Marin, G., and Prescott, D. M., J. Cell Biol., 21, 159–167 (1964).
Gibson, D. A., and Prescott, D. M., Expl Cell Res., 74, 397–402 (1972).
Kato, H., Expl Cell Res., 82, 383–390 (1973).
Kihlman, B. A., Sturelid, S., Palitti, F., and Bacchetti, A., Mutat. Res. (in the press).
Latt, S. A., Stetten, G., Juergens, L. A., Buchanan, G. R., and Gerald, P. S., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 72, 4066–4070 (1975).
Magni, G. E.,and von Borstel, R. C., Genetics, 47, 1097–1108 (1962).
Bootsma, D., Mulder, M. P., Pot, F., and Cohen, J. A., Mutat. Res., 9, 507–516 (1970).
Goto, K., Akematsu, T., Shimazu, H., and Sugiyama, T., Chromosoma. 53, 223–230 (1975).
Cleaver, J. E., Proc. 4th Life Sciences Symposium on Mechanisms of Molecular and Cellular Toxicity, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health (Suppl.) (in the press).
Kato, H., Expl Cell Res., 85, 239–247 (1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WOLFF, S., RODIN, B. & CLEAVER, J. Sister chromatid exchanges induced by mutagenic carcinogens in normal and xeroderma pigmentosum cells. Nature 265, 347–349 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/265347a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/265347a0
This article is cited by
-
A DNA-conjugated magnetic nanoparticle assay for assessing genotoxicity
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (2012)
-
Effects of radioprotective ginseng protein on UV induced sister chromatid exchanges
Archives of Pharmacal Research (1988)
-
Normal sister chromatid exchange in lymphocytes from patients with multiple epidermal cancer?
Archives of Dermatological Research (1987)
-
Sister chromatid exchange and cell kinetics of marrow cells in acute Non-lymphocytic leukemia
Acta Academiae Medicinae Wuhan (1985)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.